期刊文献+

论政府环境规制与企业竞争力的提升——基于“波特假设”理论验证的影响因素分析 被引量:7

Raise of Enterprise Competitive Ability Under Government Environmental Regulations——Analysis of Influence Factors Based on Porter Hypothesis Verification
下载PDF
导出
摘要 政府环境规制导致企业环境成本内部化,增加了企业环境管理成本,进而影响企业市场竞争力。"波特假设"下企业竞争力提升存在诸多的影响因素,例如企业创新能力的差异性、创新成果转化为生产能力的不可预测性、政府环境规制运作模式的可选择性、企业与政府之间博弈的不确定性等。由于环境规制下企业竞争力的提升主要依赖于既定的外部条件和企业对政府环境规制措施所做出的策略性反应,因此,企业内部环境管理的战略规划制定应在遵循政府环境规制前提下,尽量减少政府环境规制对企业内部环境的负面影响,实现企业环境绩效和经济绩效的"双赢"。 The government environmental regulations cause the inlamahzation of enterprises environment cost which increases enterprises' environment management cost, and influences enterprises' which competition strength. Unaler Portar Hypotheis, there are many influence factors on enhancing the competitiveness of enterprises, such as the innovation ability, the transformation ability from innovation to production, the operation mode of government environmental regulations, and the indefinite gaml result between the government and enterprises. The conclusions show that, with fixed ecternal conditions, the tactics that enterprises adopt for governments' regulations about environment decide the competition ability of enterprises. Enterprises therefore ought to follow the government environmental rules in making the strategy for internal environment management, to reduce, and achieve the win-win mode between the environment and econonomic performance negative effect as possible.
作者 王爱兰
出处 《天津大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第5期389-392,共4页 Journal of Tianjin University:Social Sciences
基金 国家教育部"985"工程基金资助项目(A06015)
关键词 政府环境规制 环境成本补偿 企业竞争力 影响因素 government environmental regulations environment cost compensation enterprise competitive ability influence factor
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献40

  • 1Jaffe A B, Peterson S R , Portney P R, Stavins R N. Environmental Regulation and the competitiveness of U. S. Manufacttaing: What Does the Evidence Tell Us[J] .Journal of Economics Literature, 1995,33:132-163.
  • 2Maler K G.The acid rain game[C]. In: Folmer H,van Ireland E. eds. Valuation Methods and Policy Making in Environmental[A].Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1989.
  • 3Porter M E. America's green strategy[J], scientific American, 1991,(6).
  • 4Sehot Johan, Kurt Fischer. Introduction: The greening the industrial film[A]. In: Kurt Fischer:, Johan Schot. Environmental strategies for industry: International perspectives on research needs and policy implications[C]. Washington D C:Island Press, 1993.
  • 5Walley N, Whitehead B.It's not easy being green[J].Harvard Business Review, 1994,72(3).
  • 6Albrecht Johan. Environmenyal regulation, comparative advantage and the porter hypothesis[M]. Milan:FEEM Nota dl Lavoro, 1997.
  • 7Alpay S.Can environmental regulations be compatible with higher international competitiveness? Some new theoretical insights[M]. Milan: FEEM Nora di Lavoro,2001.
  • 8Barbera A J, McConnell V D. the impact of environmental regulations on industry productiviy: direct and indirect effects[J] .Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1990,18:50-65.
  • 9Brannlund R Y Chung et al. Emissions Trading and Prdltability: The Swedish Pulp and Paper Industry[M] .RePEc working papers, 1995.
  • 10Gray W B, Shabegian. Pollution Abatement Cost, Regulation and Plant Level Productivity[M] .Washington D C:NBER Working Paper, 1995.

共引文献164

同被引文献106

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部