期刊文献+

基于物元和组合权重的产品广义质量评价研究及应用 被引量:14

Study and Application of Generalized Quality Evaluation of Products by Combination Weights and Fuzzy Matter Element
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为客观有效地评价产品的总功能和全性能(广义质量),以物元模型为基础,结合广义质量指标体系和评价的一般过程,在指标的权重确定中综合了层次分析法和熵值法.同时对于不同性质的指标采用了不同的从优模式,排除了由于各项指标单位不同以及其数值数量级之间的悬殊差别所带来的影响,从权重确定和指标质量两个方面均对一般评价方法做了改进,避免了不合理结果的产生.以经济型轿车为例,用基于组合权重的产品广义质量综合评价法对其综合性能进行了评定.结果表明,此方法能合理地分配指标的权重,有效地对产品进行综合评价,评价结果全面体现了产品的综合性能,为用户选择产品,企业制定产品战略提供科学依据. Based on the fuzzy matter element model and generalized quality evaluation indices,a relevant evaluation was done objectively and efficiently for products' overall quality/performance,where the index weights were determined by AHP in combination with entropy weight coefficients so as to exclude the influences from the difference between index units especially between the orders of magnitude of index values.Thus,the irrational outcome can be avoided by determining both index weights and performance indices.Taking a car as example,its overall performance was evaluated with the generalized quality evaluation using combination weights,and the results showed that the index weights are reasonably assigned with its overall performance evaluated properly and completely.The evaluation method can provide scientific reference for customers to select the products they desire and make the strategy for the enterprise to develop their products.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第9期1314-1317,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50535010)
关键词 广义质量评价 组合权重 物元 层次分析法 熵值法 generalized quality evaluation combination weight fuzzy matter element AHP(analytic hierarchy process) entropy weight coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1闻邦椿,周知承,韩清凯,苏保群.现代机械产品设计在新产品开发中的重要作用——兼论面向产品总体质量的“动态优化、智能化和可视化”三化综合设计法[J].机械工程学报,2003,39(10):43-52. 被引量:80
  • 2李小彭,任朝晖,宋乃慧,闻邦椿.“三化”综合设计法在产品质量综合评价中的应用[J].东北大学学报(自然科学版),2006,27(5):532-535. 被引量:4
  • 3Zhao Y W, Zhang G X. A new integrated design method based on fuzzy matter-element optimization [J ]. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 2002,129 ( 1 ) :612 - 618.
  • 4Chen L H, Weng M C. An evaluation approach to engineering design in QFD proteges using fuzzy goal programming models [J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 172 ( 1 ) : 230 - 248.
  • 5Yeo S H, Mak M W, Balon S A P. Analysis of decision making methodologies for desirability score of conceptual design[J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2004,15(2) : 195 - 208.
  • 6Lee Y, Kozar K A. Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: an analytic hierarchy process (A H P) approach[J ]. Decision Support Systems, 2006,42 ( 3 ) : 1383 1401.
  • 7Bertolini M, Braglia M, Carmignani G. Application of the AHP methodology in making a proposal for a public work contract[J]. Internatlonal Journal of Project Management, 2006,24 (5):422 - 430.
  • 8Ngai E W T. Evaluation of knowledge management tools using AHP[J ]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2005,29 (4) : 889 - 899.

二级参考文献23

  • 1魏效玲,曹庆奎,潘越.产品性能评价模型研究[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(6):91-94. 被引量:20
  • 2解建喜,宋笔锋,刘东霞.飞机顶层设计中的模糊质量功能配置方法[J].机械工程学报,2004,40(9):165-170. 被引量:13
  • 3路甬祥.工程设计的发展趋势和未来[J].机械工程学报,1997,33(1):1-8. 被引量:108
  • 4李林.面向产品全生命周期的过程建模与工作流管理[J].软件学报,1998,9:207-210.
  • 5施普尔 宁汝新(译).虚拟产品开发技术[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2000,5..
  • 6朱淼良.自主式智能系统[M].杭州:浙江大学出版社,1998..
  • 7Arun Kanjur, Sundar Krishnamarty. A robust multi-criteria optimization approach. Mech. Mach. Theory, 1997, 32(7):799~810.
  • 8Fan Dai. Virtual Reality for Industrial Application. Berlin:Springer-Verlag, 1998.
  • 9Biren Prasad. Conncurrent Engineering Fundamentals. Vol. 1.USA, 1996.
  • 10Hart S B, Chen S K, Ebrahimpour M, et al. A conceptual QFD planning model. Journal of Quality and Reliability Management, 2001, 18(8):796~812.

共引文献82

同被引文献153

引证文献14

二级引证文献277

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部