期刊文献+

基于理想点法的语言评价矩阵评判专家水平研究 被引量:6

Study on the Assessment Level of Experts Based on Ideal Point of Linguistic Assessment Matrices
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对群决策中语言评价矩阵形式偏好信息的评判专家水平问题,提出了一种分析方法.首先,给出了有关语言评价矩阵的若干定义及性质;然后,通过定义专家与专家群体判断之间的偏差距离矩阵、方案集的正理想点和负理想点,根据专家判断与理想点之间的贴近度,给出了基于语言评价矩阵形式偏好信息的评判专家水平的分析方法,最后通过一个算例说明了所提出的分析方法的可行性.本方法使决策结果更加可靠、可信,可作为评判专家水平的备选方法. With respect to the problem of assessing level of experts based on the linguistic assessment matrices inform of preference information,an analytic method is proposed to define the linguistic assessment matrices with their natures revealed. Then,by defining the deviation distance matrices between individual and grouped experts' assessment decision matrices and positive/negative ideal points of alternative set,an analytic method is given to assessment level of experts based on TOPSIS(technique for order preference by similarity to ideal solution). A numerical example is given to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed approach which will results in more reliable and credible decision-making and can be taken as an alternative way to assess expert level.
出处 《东北大学学报(自然科学版)》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第9期1362-1365,共4页 Journal of Northeastern University(Natural Science)
基金 辽宁省教育基金资助项目(2004F10820060647) 中国博士后科学基金资助项目(20070421057)
关键词 群决策 语言评价矩阵 评判专家水平 理想点逼近方法 排序 group decision-making linguistic assessment matrix assessment level of experts TOPSIS ranking
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy proeess[M]. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1980.
  • 2Warfield J N. Spreadthink: explaining ineffective groups[J]. System Research, 1995,12 ( 1 ) : 5 - 14.
  • 3Saaty T L. Physics as a decision theory[J ]. European Journal of Operational Research, 1990,48 ( 1 ) : 98 - 104.
  • 4Orlorski S A. Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation[J ]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1978,1:155 - 167.
  • 5Tanio T. Fttzzy preference ordering in group decision making[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1984,12 : 117 - 131.
  • 6Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. Direct approach processes in group making using linguistic OWA operators[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996, 79:175 - 190.
  • 7Kacprxyk J. Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority[J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1986,18:105-118.
  • 8Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. On aggregation operations of linguistic lable [ J ]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1993,8 : 351 - 370.
  • 9Yager R R. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision[J]. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1998,18 : 183 - 190.
  • 10Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A sequential selection process in group decision making with linguistic assessment[J].Information Science, 1995,85:223 - 239.

二级参考文献23

共引文献98

同被引文献78

引证文献6

二级引证文献39

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部