期刊文献+

论最简句法框架下的多次拼读及其理论局限性 被引量:1

On Multiple Spell-out and Its Theoretical Limitations in the Framework of Minimalist Syntax
下载PDF
导出
摘要 拼读在最简句法中是一个非常重要的概念。拼读如何发生、何时发生直接决定了最简句法的推导模式和运作机制。以最简方案的最新理论为基础,集中讨论了Chomsky和Epstein在最简方案框架下所提出的多次拼读的思想,并分析了他们各自的理论局限性。 Spell - out is a very important concept in minimalist syntax. When and how spell - out will apply directly determine the derivational model and working mechanism of the minimatist syntax. Based on the latest development of the minimalist program, this paper discusses the proposals on multiple spell - out as suggested by Chomsky and Epstein under the framework of the minimalist program and analyses their respective theoretical limitations.
作者 傅玉
出处 《天津外国语学院学报》 2008年第5期30-36,共7页 Journal Of Tianjin Foreign Studies University
关键词 最简句法 拼读 特征 推导 minimalist syntax spell - out feature derivation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献24

  • 1傅玉.最简句法中的层阶性及其理论局限性[J].外语教学,2007,28(4):24-28. 被引量:9
  • 2Dennett, D. 1988. When philosophy encounters artificial intelligence [J]. Proceedings of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 117:283-95.
  • 3Dummett, M. 1986. A nice derangement of epitaphs:Some comments on Davidson and Hacking [A]. In E. Lepore (ed.). Truth and Interpretation [C].Oxford: Blackwell.
  • 4Boskovic, Z. On multiple wh-fronting[J]. Linguistic Inquiry, 2002(33) : 351-83.
  • 5Chomsky, N. Condition on transformations[A]. In Anderson, S. R. and Kiparsky. P (eds.) A Festschrift for Morris Halle[C]. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 1973.
  • 6Chomsky, N. The Minimalist Program[M]. Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press, 1995a.
  • 7Chomsky, N. Bare phrase structure[A]. In Gert Webelhuth (ed.) Government Binding Theory and the Minimalist Program[C]. Cambridge: Blackwell Publishers, 1995b.
  • 8Chomsky, N. Minimalist Inquiries: the framework[A]. In R. Martin, D. Michaels and J. Uriagereka (eds.) Step by Step: Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik[C]. Cambridge, Mass : MIT Press,2000.
  • 9Chomsky, N. Derivation by phase[A]. In M. Kenstowiez (ed.) Ken Hale: a Life in Language[C]. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press, 2001.
  • 10Chomsky, N. Beyond explanatory adequacy[A]. Structure and Beyond: Current Issues in the Theory of Language[C]. Oxford: OUP, 2004.

共引文献69

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部