期刊文献+

历史的解构与重构:泛化“封建”的话语分析 被引量:13

Deconstructing & Reconstructing History:Generalization of "Feudalism" as a Historical Term
下载PDF
导出
摘要 "封建"泛化与封建话语的形成有关。该话语构造了现代史学的知识空间、表征结构与作为进化的直线时间观,与《易经》为代表的民族史学思维格格不入,但却渗透于现代汉语变迁的整个历史过程,并取得能对中国文化进行诠释和支配的话语权。由此,用"封建"作为中国历史的断代词语,或者给今天中国传统文化现象进行定性,都只是没有任何历史和文化根据的当代话语游戏而已。 : By comparing the differences of historical world views between the modern West and the ancient China, it is revealed that this phenomenon is attributed to the emergence of Feudalist discourse which creates a space of knowing, the structure of representation, and an assumption of seeing time as a lineal process of evolution. Such a discourse is irrelevant to the Chinese tradition and in sharp conflict with the history composed under the influence of Yijing. Nevertheless, the discourse penetrates the whole process of transforming the modern Chinese language, obtaining a power to dominate the Chinese culture and its interpretation. Therefore attempts to use Fengjian as a term to name a stage of Chinese history or evaluate Chinese culture should be regarded purely as a contemporary discursive game without any historical or cultural foundation.
作者 吴宗杰
出处 《武汉大学学报(人文科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期522-527,共6页 Wuhan University Journal (Humanity Sciences)
关键词 封建 史学话语 新词 feudalism historical discourse neologism
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献4

  • 1[2]朱伯崑.易学哲学史·前言[M].北京:华夏出版社,1995.
  • 2[3]周易[M].北京:中华书局影印《十三经注疏》本,1980.
  • 3[6]周易研究论文集[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,1990.
  • 4.四库全书总目[M].北京:中华书局,1965..

同被引文献158

引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部