期刊文献+

古代文论阐释的“陷阱”——兼谈古代文论的现代转化 被引量:2

The Traps of the Ancient Literature Review Elucidatory——Some Remarks about the Modern Transformation of Ancient Literature Review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 中国古代文论的生产具有较强的文学经验依赖性,中国古代文论的存在已经场域化。在古代文论现代意义转化的语境下,古代文论的研究不能仅仅依靠阐释,应该引入传统工夫论的方法,保障古代文论参与当代文论建构的有效性。 Clump (eong) and cluster (cu) are set quantifiers that indicate things pile up together and they used in bunch of things. However, Clump (cong) and cluster (cu) have some differences in the choice over nominal structures. These differences are related to the cognition and semantics foundation of clump (cong) and cluster (cu). The most basic cognition and semantics foundation is as follows: clump (cong) is used in the big aggregate, and cluster (cu) is used in the diminutive aggregate. In addition, clump (cong) also has such semantic features as [+bulk, discrete+-] , and cluster (cu) has such semantic features as [-+ mission-shaped, pool +].
作者 李涛
出处 《合肥师范学院学报》 2008年第5期66-69,90,共5页 Journal of Hefei Normal University
基金 安徽省教育厅人文社科项目"俯仰天地与中国诗学精神"(2007SK328)
关键词 古代文论 生产 场域 阐释 工夫论 Clump Cluster quantifier semantics
  • 相关文献

同被引文献14

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部