摘要
中国古代文论的生产具有较强的文学经验依赖性,中国古代文论的存在已经场域化。在古代文论现代意义转化的语境下,古代文论的研究不能仅仅依靠阐释,应该引入传统工夫论的方法,保障古代文论参与当代文论建构的有效性。
Clump (eong) and cluster (cu) are set quantifiers that indicate things pile up together and they used in bunch of things. However, Clump (cong) and cluster (cu) have some differences in the choice over nominal structures. These differences are related to the cognition and semantics foundation of clump (cong) and cluster (cu). The most basic cognition and semantics foundation is as follows: clump (cong) is used in the big aggregate, and cluster (cu) is used in the diminutive aggregate. In addition, clump (cong) also has such semantic features as [+bulk, discrete+-] , and cluster (cu) has such semantic features as [-+ mission-shaped, pool +].
出处
《合肥师范学院学报》
2008年第5期66-69,90,共5页
Journal of Hefei Normal University
基金
安徽省教育厅人文社科项目"俯仰天地与中国诗学精神"(2007SK328)