摘要
法官释明权是诉讼法学的一个重要问题,在行政诉讼法学界却没有得到应有的重视。法官释明权作为职权主义诉讼模式的应有之义,更作为当事人主义诉讼模式的必要"补丁",其价值在现今两大法系都获得不同程度的彰显。在倾向职权主义模式的行政诉讼领域,作为制度事实的法官释明权已经存在,法律规范也在其解释功能的缝隙中透露着释明权的生存空间。因此,在理论上厘定和梳理行政诉讼法的法官释明权体现出一定的急迫性。
The system of Au it deserves in the area of Ad System, also a supplement fkaungsrecht, a big issue in Procedural Law as it is, receives little attention as ministrative Procedure. A definition for the procedural model of the Authority to System of a Litigant as well as the Procedural Model, this term has its special value in the two currently leading law systems. It not only exerts its effect in Administrative Procedure area which values the Authority System, but also in legal norms that accounts for its function. It therefore has its theoretical significance in its urgent application in reconstructing the Administrative Procedural Law.
出处
《江苏工业学院学报(社会科学版)》
2008年第3期30-33,共4页
Journal of Jiangsu Polyetchnic University:Social Science Edition
关键词
释明权
行政诉讼
职权主义
当事人主义
辩论主义
Key words: the system of aufkaungsrecht
administrative aroeedure
the authority system
the system of a Litigant
the adversary yystem