期刊文献+

Analysis of the Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

Analysis of the Clinicopathologic Features and Prognosis in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical and pathological features,as well as prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients.METHODS A total of 509 cases of operable breast cancer from January,2002 to June,2002 treated in the Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University were analyzed.The Her-2,ER and PR status was determined using immunohistochemistry.Of the total cases,one group was identifi ed as triple negative breast cancer,ie defi ned as ER,PR and Her-2 negative.The other group was non-triple-negative breast cancer.Clinicopathologic features of the groups were compared and 5-year disease-free survival(DFS) analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method.RESULTS Of the total cases,21.4%(109/509) of cases were found to be triple-negative while 78.6%(400/509) were non-triple-negative.The triple negative group had higher incidence rates than the non-triple-negative group of the medullary type and Grade Ⅲ tumors(P < 0.05).There was no other difference in the clinicopathologic features between the 2 groups.From follow-up to June,2007,21.1%(23/109) of the triple-negative group and 12.7%(51/400) of the non-triple negative group had a local recurrence or distant metastasis,resulting in a signifi cant difference(P < 0.05).In the triple-negative group and non-triple-negative group,5-year DFS were 78.9% and 87.3% respectively.There was a statistically signifi cant difference between the 2 groups(P = 0.031).CONCLUSION Compared with non-triple-negative breast cancer,triple-negative breast cancer patients have an increased likehood of a local recurrence or distant metastasis and a poorer prognosis. OBJECTIVE To investigate the clinical and pathological features,as well as prognosis in triple-negative breast cancer patients. METHODS A total of 509 cases of operable breast cancer from January,2002 to June,2002 treated in the Cancer Hospital of Tianjin Medical University were analyzed.The Her-2,ER and PR status was determined using immunohistochemistry.Of the total cases,one group was identifi ed as triple negative breast cancer,ie defi ned as ER,PR and Her-2 negative.The other group was non-triple-negative breast cancer.Clinicopathologic features of the groups were compared and 5-year disease-free survival(DFS) analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS Of the total cases,21.4%(109/509) of cases were found to be triple-negative while 78.6%(400/509) were non-triple-negative.The triple negative group had higher incidence rates than the non-triple-negative group of the medullary type and Grade Ⅲ tumors(P 〈 0.05).There was no other difference in the clinicopathologic features between the 2 groups.From follow-up to June,2007,21.1%(23/109) of the triple-negative group and 12.7%(51/400) of the non-triple negative group had a local recurrence or distant metastasis,resulting in a signifi cant difference(P 〈 0.05).In the triple-negative group and non-triple-negative group,5-year DFS were 78.9% and 87.3% respectively.There was a statistically signifi cant difference between the 2 groups(P = 0.031). CONCLUSION Compared with non-triple-negative breast cancer,triple-negative breast cancer patients have an increased likehood of a local recurrence or distant metastasis and a poorer prognosis.
出处 《Chinese Journal of Clinical Oncology》 CSCD 2008年第5期387-390,共4页 中国肿瘤临床(英文版)
基金 a grant from Science and Technology Planning Project of Tanjin,China(No.043111111)
关键词 乳癌 临床诊断 病理学 治疗措施 breast cancer, triple negative, pathology, clinical,prognosis.
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献30

  • 1王殊,王杉,张嘉庆,乔新民,杨德启,佟富中,叶颖江,崔志荣.雌激素受体亚型在人乳腺癌的表达及意义[J].中华外科杂志,2004,42(13):792-794. 被引量:16
  • 2董广璐,张淑云,邢丽娜,郑淑香.宫颈癌放疗前后肿瘤细胞凋亡及其相关基因的变化[J].中国肿瘤临床,2004,31(19):1098-1100. 被引量:10
  • 3陈公琰,洪璇,李英红,冯占军.p21、p27、bcl-2和bax在肺癌组织中表达的意义及相关性研究[J].中国肿瘤临床,2005,32(21):1216-1219. 被引量:5
  • 4孙慧,张静,战忠利,郝希山.雌激素受体-β与其信号传导通路中相关基因在不同乳腺癌模型发展中的作用机制[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(11):1422-1423. 被引量:8
  • 5Ellis IO, Dowsett M, Bartlett J, et al. Recommendations for HER2 testing in the UK[J].J Clin Pathol, 2000, 53(12): 890-892.
  • 6Cell Markers And Cytogenetics Committees, College Of American Pathologists. Glinical laboratory assays for HER--2/neu amplification and overexpression: quality assurance, standardization, and proficiency testing [J]. Arch Pathol Lab Med, 2002, 126 (7): 803 -808.
  • 7Williams SJ, Wreschner DH, Tran M, et al. Muc13, a novel human cell surface mucin expressed by epithelial and hemopoietic cells[J]. J Biol Chem, 2001, 276(21): 18327 - 18336.
  • 8Baldus SE, Wienand.JR, WernerJP, et al. Expression of MUC1, MUC2 and oligosaccharide epitopes in breast cancer: prognostic significance of a sialylated MUC1 epitope[J]. Int J Oncol, 2005, 27 (5): 1289-1297.
  • 9Rahn JJ, Dabbagh L, Pasdar M, et al. The importance of MUC1 cellular localization in patients with breast carcinoma: an immunohistologic study of 71 patients and review of the literature [J]. Cancer, 2001, 91(11): 1973-1982.
  • 10Petit T, Borel C, Ghnassia JP, et al. Chemotherapy response of breast cancer depends on HER-2 status and anthracycline dose intensity in the neoadjuvant setting [J]. Clin Cancer Res, 2001, 7 (6): 1577-1581.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部