建构独树一帜的现实主义美学范式——奥尔巴赫《摹仿论》评析被引量：4

On Auerbach's Mimesis:The Representation of Reality in Western Literature

导出

摘要《摹仿论》代表了西方学术研究中的一个重要传统,即语文学研究传统。奥尔巴赫通过文体分用/混用的二元视角,对西方文学发展的重要历史线索进行了历史主义的梳理,其目的在于颠覆文体分用的古典主义美学原则,建构独树一帜的现实主义美学范式。他对"现实"与现实主义取更加广义的理解,书写了一部"另类"的现实主义文学史。从学术写作的角度来看,《摹仿论》在选题立论、材料运用、批评方法、行文表达等方面给人以巨大的启发。尽管奥尔巴赫在一定程度上也受到了他的批评方法的制约,但《摹仿论》仍然不失为一部极其优秀的学术理论著作。 Mimesis:The Representation of Reality in Western Literature represents an important tradition of classic philology in European critical scholarship.Erich Auerbach combines stylistics and historical philology with interpretive analysis of specific literary passages from European literature since Homer,with an intention to subvert the classicist rule of differentiated styles and to establish a unique paradigm of literary realism that highlights the mixture of styles.As an academic work,Mimesis is highly innovative and provocative in spite of some of its limitations.

作者张和龙

机构地区上海外国语大学英美文学研究中心

出处《外国文学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第4期68-74,共7页 Foreign Literature

关键词奥尔巴赫《摹仿论》现实主义

分类号 I516 [文学—其他各国文学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1Ankersmit, Frank R. "Why Realism? Auerbach on the Representation of Reality." Poetics Today. 20 (1999) : 53-75.
2Auerbach, Erich. Mimesis: The Representation of Reality in Western Literature. Trans. Willard R. Trask. Princeton and Oxford: Princeton UP, 2003.
3Bakker, Egbert J. “Mimesis as Performance: Rereading Auerbach's First Chapter.” Poetics Today. 20 (1999) :53-75.
4Blanchard, Marc. "Mimesis, not mimicry. " Comparative Literature. 49 (1997): 176-91.
5Bremmer, Jan N. "Erich Auerbach and His Mimesis. " Poetics Today. 20 (1999): 3-10.
6Calin, William. “Erich Auerbach's Mimesis -'Tis Fifty Years Since: A Reassessment.” Style. 33 (1999) : 463-74.
7Eagleton, Terry. "Pork Chops and Pineapples." London Review of Books. 25 (2003) : 20-24.
8Holquist, Michael. “The Last European: Erich Auerbach as Precursor in the History of Cultural Criticism.” Modern Language Quarterly. 53 ( 1993 ): 371-91.
9Said, Edward W. "Introduction to the Fiftieth-Anniversary Edition." Mimesis.
10Wellek, Rene, and A. Warren. Theory of Litearature. New York: Harcourt, Brace and World, 1962.

二级参考文献6

1[德]奥尔巴赫.《摹仿论》.吴麟缦,等译.百花文艺出版社，2002年，第619页,第122—123页,第145-150页,第169页,第204页,第256—257页,第366页,第572页，第551—552页,第583页,第504页.
2R. Weltek, A History of Modem Criticism, vol. 7, Yale University Press, 1991,p. 115.
3R. Wellek, The Concept of Realism in Literary Scholarship, in Concept of Criticism, Yale University Press, 1963, p.236. Also see his A History of Modem Criticism, vol) 7, Yale University Press, 199 l,p. 120.
4[法]萨特.《什么是文学?》.见《萨特文论选》，施康强译，人民文学出版社，1991年，第245—246页.
5奥尔巴赫.《摹仿论》.百花文艺出版社，2002年，第270页，第551页，第550页，第611—612页，第617页,第612页,第203—204页,第219页,第376—378页，第401页,第599页,第610页,第437页.
6[法]罗杰·加洛蒂.《论无边的现实主义》.吴岳添译，百花文艺出版社，1998年，第176页.