期刊文献+

臭氧联合射频治疗椎间盘突出的临床对比研究 被引量:9

EFFECTS OF OZONE CHEMONUCLEOLYSIS COMBINED WITH RADIOFREQUENCY HEATING ON LUMBAR DISC HERNIATION
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:评价臭氧联合射频热凝对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法:60例病人,随机分为臭氧化学溶核组(A组)和臭氧联合射频组(B组)。A组:分别于盘内和侧隐窝注射臭氧。B组:臭氧注射同A组,加突出物射频热凝。结果:术后3天、2周、2月腰痛和腿痛评分、Oswestry评分B组均明显低于A组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。亚组腿痛评分比较,术后3天、2周,B1组(8.9±4.4、7.8±4.9)和B2组(10.0±5.2、9.2±2.9)均明显低于A2组(16.9±7.9、13.8±4.7),P<0.01或P<0.05。结论:臭氧联合突出物射频治疗效果较单纯使用臭氧好,对非包容性椎间盘突出亦如此。 Objective: To assess the therapeutic outcome of combined ozone chemonucleolysis and radio- frequency heating on lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 60 patients were randomized to Ozone chemonucleolysis alone (group A) or combined with radiofrequeney heating management (group B). Group A: received an intradiscal and lateral recess injection of an oxygen-ozone mixture. Group B: received, the radiofrequency heating targeting of the herniated disk material additionally. Results : At 3 days, 2 weeks, 2 months after treatment, there were statistically significant differences between the groups A and B for leg pain scale (15.3 ±7.3, 12.8 ±4.3, 8.6 ±4.3 VS 6.2 ±3.9, 5.0 ±3.9, 4.5 ±3.8, P 〈0.01) ; back pain scale (26.7 ±9.6, 15.7±6.3, 11.2±5.0 VS 16.3 ±5.6, 8.8±8.6, 8.0 ±5.2, P〈0. 01) ;Oswestry disability scale at 2 weeks and 2 months (18.6 ±6.7 , 13.5 ±6.1 VS 13.2 ±6.6, 10.2 ±6.1, P〈0.01, P〈0.05). At3 days, 2weeks, leg pain scale in subgroupB,(8.9±4.4, 7.8 ±4. 9) and B2(10.0 ±5.2, 9.2 ±2.9) were lower than in subgroup A2(16.9 ±7.9, 13.8±4.7), P〈0. 01, P 〈 0.05. Conclusion : The effect of ozone therapy combined with radiofrequency heating is greater than that of ozone alone.
出处 《中国疼痛医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第4期206-208,共3页 Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine
关键词 臭氧 化学髓核溶解术 射频热凝 腰椎间盘突出症 Ozone Chemonucleolysis Radiofrequency Lumbar disc herniation
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1彭耀庆,张朝跃,李小如,杨辉芳.腰椎间盘突出症的CT计量诊断探讨[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(1):19-22. 被引量:15
  • 2郑光新,赵晓鸥,刘广林,张利峰.Oswestry功能障碍指数评定腰痛患者的可信性[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2002,12(1):13-15. 被引量:556
  • 3Hagg O, Fritzell P, Nordwall A. The clinical importance of changes in outcome scores after treatment for chronic low back pain. Eur Spine J, 2003, 12 : 12-20.
  • 4Ercelen O, Bulutcu E, Oktenoglu T, et al. Radiofrequency lesioning using two different time modalities for the treatment of lumbar discogenic pain: a randomized trial. Spine, 2003, 28 : 1922 -1927.
  • 5Barendse GA, Van-Den-Berg SG, Kessels AH, et al. Randomized controlled trial of percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation for chronic discogenic back pain: lack of effect from a 90- Second 70 C lesion. Spine, 2001,26 : 287 -292.
  • 6Podhajsky RJ, Belous A, Johnson K, et al. Effects of monopolar radiofrequency heating on intradiscal pressure in sheep. Spine J, 2007, 7 : 229 -234.
  • 7姚秀高,陈建龙,周永高.射频热凝靶点消融术治疗颈椎间盘突出症的探讨[J].中国疼痛医学杂志,2006,12(4):206-209. 被引量:56
  • 8Andreula CF, Simonetti L, De-Santis F, et al. Minimally invasive oxygen-ozone therapy for lumbar disk herniation. Am J Neuroradiol, 2003, 24 : 996 - 1000.
  • 9Schmid G, Witteler A, Willburger R, etal. Lumbar disk herniation: correlation of histologic findings with marrow signal intensity changes in verte- bral endplates at MR imaging. Radiology, 2004, 231 : 352 -358.
  • 10Buric J, Molino-Lova R. in non-contained lumbar Ozone chemonucleolysis disc herniations: a pilot study with 12 months follow-up. Acta Neurochir Suppl, 2005, 92 : 93 -97.

二级参考文献16

  • 1傅志俭,谢珺田,宋文阁,赵学军.腰椎间盘突出症的治疗[J].实用疼痛学杂志,2005,1(2):98-104. 被引量:75
  • 2彭海波,傅祖国,丁寿勇.CT对腰椎间盘突出症的临床意义[J].湖南医学,1995,12(4):237-239. 被引量:2
  • 3彭耀庆 张朝跃 等.腰椎间盘突出症的CT病理学分型及临床意义[J].中华新医学,2001,2:398-398.
  • 4Deyo RA,Battie M,Beurskens AJ,et al.Outcome measures for low back pain research:a proposal for standardized use[J].Spine,1998,23:2003-2013.
  • 5Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB. The Oswestry disability index[J].Spine,2000,25:2940-2953.
  • 6Fritz JM,Irrgang JJ.A comparison of a modified Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire and the quebec back pain disability Scale[J].Phys Ther,2001,81:776-788.
  • 7Fairbank JC,Couper J,Davies JB,et al.The oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire[J].Physiotherapy,1980,66:271-273.
  • 8Schoppink LE,Van Tulder MW,Koes BW,et al.Reliability and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the quebec back pain disability scale[J].Phys Ther,1996,76:268-275.
  • 9Kopec JA,Esdaile JM,Abrahamowicz M,et al.The quebec back pain disability scale:measurement properties[J].Spine,1995,20:341-352.
  • 10Triano JJ,McGregor M,Hondras MA,et al.Manipulative therapy versus education programs in chronic low back pain[J].Spine,1995,20:948-955.

共引文献623

同被引文献87

引证文献9

二级引证文献47

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部