摘要
目的:评价臭氧联合射频热凝对腰椎间盘突出症的疗效。方法:60例病人,随机分为臭氧化学溶核组(A组)和臭氧联合射频组(B组)。A组:分别于盘内和侧隐窝注射臭氧。B组:臭氧注射同A组,加突出物射频热凝。结果:术后3天、2周、2月腰痛和腿痛评分、Oswestry评分B组均明显低于A组(P<0.05或P<0.01)。亚组腿痛评分比较,术后3天、2周,B1组(8.9±4.4、7.8±4.9)和B2组(10.0±5.2、9.2±2.9)均明显低于A2组(16.9±7.9、13.8±4.7),P<0.01或P<0.05。结论:臭氧联合突出物射频治疗效果较单纯使用臭氧好,对非包容性椎间盘突出亦如此。
Objective: To assess the therapeutic outcome of combined ozone chemonucleolysis and radio- frequency heating on lumbar disc herniation. Methods: 60 patients were randomized to Ozone chemonucleolysis alone (group A) or combined with radiofrequeney heating management (group B). Group A: received an intradiscal and lateral recess injection of an oxygen-ozone mixture. Group B: received, the radiofrequency heating targeting of the herniated disk material additionally. Results : At 3 days, 2 weeks, 2 months after treatment, there were statistically significant differences between the groups A and B for leg pain scale (15.3 ±7.3, 12.8 ±4.3, 8.6 ±4.3 VS 6.2 ±3.9, 5.0 ±3.9, 4.5 ±3.8, P 〈0.01) ; back pain scale (26.7 ±9.6, 15.7±6.3, 11.2±5.0 VS 16.3 ±5.6, 8.8±8.6, 8.0 ±5.2, P〈0. 01) ;Oswestry disability scale at 2 weeks and 2 months (18.6 ±6.7 , 13.5 ±6.1 VS 13.2 ±6.6, 10.2 ±6.1, P〈0.01, P〈0.05). At3 days, 2weeks, leg pain scale in subgroupB,(8.9±4.4, 7.8 ±4. 9) and B2(10.0 ±5.2, 9.2 ±2.9) were lower than in subgroup A2(16.9 ±7.9, 13.8±4.7), P〈0. 01, P 〈 0.05. Conclusion : The effect of ozone therapy combined with radiofrequency heating is greater than that of ozone alone.
出处
《中国疼痛医学杂志》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2008年第4期206-208,共3页
Chinese Journal of Pain Medicine