期刊文献+

澳大利亚医保药物遴选的集中审评机制及启示 被引量:2

Centralized review of medical insurance drugs in Australia and its revelation to Chinese drug review
下载PDF
导出
摘要 对澳大利亚医保药物集中审评过程的特征及其审评结果和影响进行了分析。审评过程的严谨性、角色的清晰性和数据的透明性对于评价结果的可接受性具有重要的作用。我国应借鉴澳大利亚药品审评的相关经验,寻求保证我国医保药物遴选和新药审评的有效性、透明性和可接受性的途径,以进一步优化我国医保药物遴选和新药审评机制。 We analyzed the processes of centralized drug review in Australia, and the outcomes in terms of decisions and impact. Rigor of the process, clarity of roles, and transparency of data and rationale are believed to be important for maximizing the impact and political acceptability of the processes. The drug review in China should get reference from the Australia treatment measures, to ensure more effective, transparent and acceptable in Chinese medical insurance drug selection and drug review.
出处 《中国新药杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第17期1465-1467,共3页 Chinese Journal of New Drugs
关键词 澳大利亚 医保药物 遴选 集中审评 启示 Australia medical insurance drug selection centralized drug review revelation
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

  • 1NEUMANN PJ. Evidence-based and value-based formulary guidelines[ J]. Health Aft, 2004, 23 ( 1 ) : 124 - 134.
  • 2Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee. Role of the PBAC [ EB/OL ]. [ 2008 - 04 - 01 ]. http ://www. health, gov. au/internet/main/publishing, nsf/Content/health-pbs-general-pubs-pharmpac-partl, htm.
  • 3OLIVER A, MOSSIALOS E, ROBINSON R. Health technology assessment and its influence on health care priority setting[J]. Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 2004, 20 ( 1 ) : 1 - 10.
  • 4DANIELS N, TEAGARDEN JR, SABIN JE. An ethical template for pharmacy benefits[ J]. Health Aft, 2003, 22 ( 1 ) : 125 - 137.

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部