期刊文献+

MR DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING FOR EVALUATION OF RADIOTHERAPEUTIC EFFECTS ON RABBIT VX2 TUMOR MODEL 被引量:15

MR DIFFUSION WEIGHTED IMAGING FOR EVALUATION OF RADIOTHERAPEUTIC EFFECTS ON RABBIT VX2 TUMOR MODEL
下载PDF
导出
摘要 Objective To investigate the feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for evaluation of radiotherapeutic effects on rabbit VX2 tumor model. Methods Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits received a subcutaneous implantation of VX2 tumor cell suspension 0.5 mL (4×107 cells/mL) in their right thighs to set up tumor model. And 2 weeks later they were randomly divided into therapy group (Group T, n = 10) and control group (Group C, n = 6). Group T received radiotherapy at a single dose of 10 Gy. MR imaging (MRI) scan including short TI inversion recovery echo-planar imaging DWI, T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) sequences were performed 1 day prior to as well as 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 7 days after radiotherapy. Group C received only MRI scan at the same time points without any treatment. MRI appearance on T2WI, T1WI, and DWI images was compared and tumor volume was calculated. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the tumor were evaluated in all cases. HE staining was used for pathological study. Results Necrosis (n = 8) and hemorrhage (n = 2) were seen gradually on T2WI and T1WI images of Group T after time point of day 2 after irradiation. In Group C, no obvious necrosis was found until day 7. There was no significant difference in tumor volume between the two groups before radiotherapy. After radiotherapy, tumors in Group T showed a gradual growth but not as obvious as Group C. There was a significant difference in tumor volume between the two groups from day 2 on (P < 0.05). ADC value changed dramatically right from the 1st day after radio- therapy in Group T [(0.99 ± 0.15) ×10-3 mm2/s for 1 day before radiotherapy, (1.23 ± 0.08) ×10-3, (1.45 ± 0.07) ×10-3, (1.63 ± 0.06) ×10-3, and (2.02 ± 0.18) ×10-3 mm2/s for day 1, 2, 3, and 7]; and ADC value had no significant changes after radiotherapy in Group C except day 7 [(1.07 ± 0.08) ×10-3 mm2/s for 1 day before radiotherapy, (1.03 ± 0.04) × 10-3, (1.05 ± 0.02) ×10-3, (1.05 ± 0.05) ×10-3, and (0.95 ± 0.07) ×10-3 mm2/s for day 1, 2, 3, and 7]. There was significant difference in ADC value between the two groups for each time point after radiotherapy (P < 0.01). Pathological study showed that the number of viable tumor cells in Group T decreased 1 day after radiotherapy, and the inflammatory cell infiltration was marked and almost all viable tumor cells disappeared by day 7 after radiotherapy. Conclusions DWI is a new promising technique for monitoring radiotherapy outcomes. ADC value may give a prior clue on physiological changes of radiotherapy before routine MRI could tell. Objective To investigate the feasibility of magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) for evaluation of radiotherapeutic effects on rabbit VX2 tumor model. Methods Sixteen New Zealand white rabbits received a subcutaneous implantation of VX2 tumor cell suspension 0.5 mL (4× 10^7 ceUs/mL) in their right thighs to set up tumor model. And 2 weeks later they were randomly divided into therapy group (Group T, n = 10) and control group (Group C, n = 6). Group T received radiotherapy at a single dose of 10 Gy. MR imaging (MRI) scan including short TI inversion recovery echo-planar imaging DWI, T1-weighted imaging (T1WI) and T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) sequences were performed 1 day prior to as well as 1 day, 2 days, 3 days and 7 days after radiotherapy. Group C received only MRI scan at the same time points without any treatment. MRI appearance on T2WI, TlWI, and DWI images was compared and tumor volume was calculated. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of the tumor were evaluated in all cases. HE staining was used for pathological study. Results Necrosis (n = 8) and hemorrhage (n = 2) were seen gradually on T2WI and T1WI images of Group T after time point of day 2 after irradiation. In Group C, no obvious necrosis was found until day 7. There was no significant difference in tumor volume between the two groups before radiotherapy. After radiotherapy, tumors in Group T showed a gradual growth but not as obvious as Group C. There was a significant difference in tumor volume between the two groups from day 2 on (P 〈 0.05). ADC value changed dramatically fight from the 1st day after radiotherapy in Group T [(0.99 ± 0.15) ×10^-3 mm^2/s for 1 day before radiotherapy, (1.23 ± 0.08) ×10^-3 , (1.45 ± 0.07) ×10^-3 , (1.63 ± 0.06) ×10^-3 , and (2.02 ± 0.18) ×10^-3 mm^2 for day 1, 2, 3, and 7]; and ADC value had no significant changes after radiotherapy in Group C except day 7 [(1.07±0.08) ×10^-3 mm^2 for 1 day before radiotherapy, (1.03 ± 0.04)×10^-3 , (1.05 ± 0.02)×10^-3 , (1.05 ± 0.05) ×10^-3 , and (0.95 ± 0.07) ×10^-3 mm^2 for day 1, 2, 3, and 7]. There was significant difference in ADC value between the two groups for each time point after radiotherapy (P 〈 0.01). Pathological study showed that the number of viable tumor cells in Group T decreased 1 day after radiotherapy, and the inflammatory cell infiltration was marked and almost all viable tumor cells disappeared by day 7 after radiotherapy. Conclusions DWI is a new promising technique for monitoring radiotherapy outcomes. ADC value may give a prior clue on physiological changes of radiotherapy before routine MRI could tell.
出处 《Chinese Medical Sciences Journal》 CAS CSCD 2008年第3期172-177,共6页 中国医学科学杂志(英文版)
关键词 动物模型 放射治疗 磁共振成像 扩散加权成像 diffusion magnetic resonance imaging radiotherapy animal experiment
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1[1]Deng J,Rhee TK,Sato KT,et al.In vivo diffusion-weighted imaging of liver tumor necrosis in the VX2 rabbit model at 1.5 Tesla.Invest Radiol 2006; 41:410-4.
  • 2[2]Moffat BA,Hall DE,Stojanovska J,et al.Diffusion imaging for evaluation of tumor therapies in preclinical animal models.MAGMA 2004; 17:249-59.
  • 3[3]Tbeilmann RJ,Borders R,Trouard TP,et al.Changes in water mobility measured by diffusion MRI predict response of metastatic breast cancer to chemotherapy.Neoplasia 2004; 6:831-7
  • 4[4]Mardor Y,Roth Y,Oehershvilli A,et al.Pretreatment predic-tion of brain tumors' response to radiation therapy using high b-value diffusion-weighted MRI.Neoplasia 2004; 6:136-42.
  • 5[5]Roth Y,Tichler T,Kostenieh G,et al.High-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging for pretreatment prediction and early monitoring of tumor response to therapy in mice.Radiology 2004; 232:685-92.
  • 6[6]Smith WE,Kidd JG,Roils P,et al.Experiments of the cause of the rabbit carcinomas derived from vires-induced papilloma.Propagation of several of the cancers in sucklings with etiological tests.J Exp Med 1952; 95:299-317.
  • 7[7]Kamel IR,Bluemke DA,Ramsey D,et al.Role of diffusion-weighted imaging in estimating tumor necrosis after chemoe-mbolization of hepatocellular carcinoma.AJR 2003; 181:708-10.
  • 8[8]James K,Eisenhauer E,Christian M,et al.Measuring res-ponse in solid tumors:unidimensional versus bidimensional measurement.J Natl Cancer Inst 1999; 91:523-8.
  • 9[9]Yang WT,Johnson PJ.Monitoring response to treatment in liver tumours.Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin G-astroenterol 1999; 13:637-54.
  • 10[10]Low RN.Magnetic resonance imaging in the oncology patient:evaluation of the extrahepatic abdomen.Semin Ultrasound CT MR 2005; 26:224-36.

同被引文献51

引证文献15

二级引证文献99

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部