关于《文选》与《集》同文异题问题——兼论《文选》非仓促成书

A Discussion on the Connection of "Wen Xuan"(Anthology) and "Ji"(Collection)——And "Wen Xuan"(Anthology) Was Not Written In A Rush

李善以《集》与《文选》所题异,断《赠丁仪》与《又赠丁仪王粲》之"仪"、《为顾彦先赠妇》之"俱云‘赠妇’"与《为顾彦先赠妇二首》之"云‘赠妇’"为"误也"等等,均非圆照。其失乃因一切以《集》为准,而没有注意到这些《集》多非作者手编。即从文献可信度的层面看,《文选》所题未必不及"《集》云"。今人或以此为《文选》成书仓促之一证,其失或仅以《文选》观《文选》,或以今绳古。以古还古,将《文选》放在古代文化背景上考察,至今为止,没有任何材料能证明其成书仓促。

As the content of ＂Wen Xuan＂ （Anthology） and ＂Ji＂ （Collection） are different, LiShan held that it was not right to say Yi m ZengDingYi and ＂You ZengDmgYiWangCan , ＂ZengFu＂ in ＂WeiGuYanXianZengFu＂ and ＂WeiGuYanXianZengFuErShou＂ were wrong. That most parts of ＂Ji＂ were not collected by the writer was always ignored. People today think that ＂Wen Xuan＂ （Anthology） was written in a rush because they read it alone without paying attention to the social situation when it was written. There haven＇ t been proved that ＂Wen Xuan＂ （Anthology） was written in a rush so far.