两晋沙门敬不敬王者之争再考察——以儒佛关系的变迁为切入点

A re-examination of the debates on sramana's disobedience of courtesies to kings during the Jin Dynasty

通过晋朝两次沙门敬不敬王者之争的对比,可发现两次论辩无论是论辩的背景、论争双方的成员构成还是论争的重心都大不相同。而如果从整个儒佛关系发展的历史来看,我们可以更清楚地看到,沙门敬不敬王者之争并非仅是儒佛伦理之争,宗教与政治的博弈决定了论争的发展和走向。

By comparing the debates on sramana＇ s disobedience of courtesies to kings in the Jin Dynasties, it can be found that they have many differences in background, participant and the center of gravities of contestation. If see from the history of the whole relation between confusion and buddhism, we can see clearly that the debates on sramana＇ s disobedience of courtesies to kings is not only a fight for the ethics of confusion and buddhism, the game between religion and politics had decided the development and alignment of the contestation.