摘要
我国《刑法》及《反洗钱法》都规定了洗钱犯罪的主观方面须为"明知",而如何证明洗钱犯罪嫌疑人的"明知"则是洗钱犯罪诉讼证明中的重要环节。但是,仅有嫌疑人的自认尚不足以完全证明其"明知"的存在,还需要有其他证据来予以补强。这可以通过利用间接证据或推定来获得。此外,利用举证责任倒置而确立嫌疑人的有限举证责任,并以此来证明洗钱罪的主观方面,也不失为一个值得考虑的做法。
Chinese Criminal Law and Anti-money Laundering Law had stipulated that the Money-laundering crime subjective as- pect should be "knowing perfectly well", but how to prove "knowing perfectly well" is important link in the money laundering crime lawsuit proof. But, only suspect's confess was not sufficient to fully prove the existence, so, other evidences are needed to be rein- forced. This may obtain through the use of indirect evidence or the presumption. In addition, the use of inversion of the burden of proof to establish the suspect and the limited burden of proof is a practice worthy of consideration.
出处
《河南公安高等专科学校学报》
2008年第5期110-112,共3页
Journal of Henan Public Security Academy
关键词
洗钱罪
推定
举证责任倒置
Money-laundering offences
Presumption
Inversion of the burden of proof