摘要
2006年颁布的《刑法修正案(六)》设立了骗取贷款罪,为我国进一步打击滥用贷款的行为提供了立法依据。这一罪名的增设改变了以往我国对于滥用贷款着重从贷款目的进行单一规制的局面,确立了贷款目的和贷款手段的双重规制的立法模式。这一改变必然给司法实践带来诸多的影响,要适应这一立法模式其关键在于如何正确理解骗取贷款罪、高利转贷罪和贷款诈骗罪三罪的特点及相互间的关系。
Amendment Ⅵ to the Criminal Code of the People＇s Republic of China established a crime called cheating on loans. It helped to offer a legislative basis for cracking down on abusing loans. The crime prescribed the purpose of loans and means of loans rather than the purpose of loans only. The change detqnitely affected our judicial practice. The key to use this legislative mode was understanding three different crimes （cheating on loans, transfer loans in high interest, swindling loans ） and their relationships.
出处
《南京医科大学学报（社会科学版）》
2008年第3期216-220,共5页
Journal of Nanjing Medical University（Social Sciences）
关键词
骗取贷款罪
高利转贷罪
贷款诈骗罪
关系
适用
cheating on loans
transfer loans in high interest
swindling loans
relationship
application
