期刊文献+

国产替罗非班对急性心肌梗死冠状动脉介入治疗术后心肌灌注的影响 被引量:3

Effect of tirofiban on myocardial perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的评价替罗非班在急性心肌梗死(AMI)直接冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中的有效性和安全性。方法行直接PCI治疗的AMI患者,分为预先应用替罗非班组(40例)和对照组(32例),比较两组患者的无复流发生率、心肌灌注分级(TMPG)和出血并发症。结果两组患者均成功完成PCI操作,试验组有4例(10%)出现无复流或慢复流现象,对照组共有8例(25%)出现无复流现象,试验组无复流发生率有低于对照组的趋势,但未达到显著水平,替罗非班组的TMPGⅢ级比例高于对照组,但未达到统计学显著水平,两组主要不良事件无显著性差异。两组患者总的出血并发症相似,均无严重出血并发症。结论国产替罗非班能降低AMI直接PCI时无复流现象,改善冠状动脉血流,且不增加严重出血并发症。 AIM To investigate the effect and safety of China-made tirofiban in patients with acute myocardial infarction treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention. METHODS Seventy-two AMI patients were included in the study, who received either Tirofiban before the index procedure ( n = 40) or just PCI alone (n = 32). The no reflow rate, TIMI myocardial perfusion grade (TMPG) , major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and bleeding complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS PCI were successfully performed in all patients. The no reflow rate in Tirofiban group was not significantly lower than that in control group ( 10% versus 25% ) and the percentage of TMPG Ⅲ grade in Tirofiban group was not significantly higher than that in control group (45% versus 25% ). MACE during hospitalization and bleeding complications had no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION Tirofiban, a Glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲa receptor blocker, administrated in primary PCI of AMI patients can safely reduce no reflow rate and improve myocardial perfusion.
出处 《心脏杂志》 CAS 2008年第5期605-607,共3页 Chinese Heart Journal
关键词 替罗非班 心肌梗死 急性 冠状动脉介入治疗 无复流 心肌灌注 tirofiban acute myocardial infarction primary percutaneous coronary intervention myocardial perfusion no reflow
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Gibson CM, Cannon CP, Murphy SA, et al. Relationship of the TIMI myocardial perfusion grades, flow grades, frame count, and percutaneous coronary intervention to long-term outcomes after thrombolytic administration in acute myocardial infarction [ J ]. Circulation, 2002, 105(5) :1909 - 1913.
  • 2Morrow DA, Sabatine MS, Antman EM, et al. Usefulness of tirofiban among patients treated without percutaneous coronary intervention (TIMI high risk patients in PRISM-PLUS) [J]. Am J Cardiol, 2004, 94(6) :774 -776.
  • 3Valgimigli M, Percoco G, Barbieri D, et al. The additive value of tirofiban administered with the high-dose bolus in the prevention of ischemie complications during high-risk coronary angioplasty: the ADVANCE Trial[ J]. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004, 44(1) :14 -19.
  • 4Montalescot G, Borentain M, Payot L, et al. Early vs late administration of glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa inhibitors in primary percutaneous coronary intervention of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction : a meta-analysis[ J ]. JAMA, 2004, 292 ( 3 ) :362 - 366.
  • 5Huynh T, Piazza N, DiBattiste PM, et al. Analysis of bleeding complications associated with glycoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a receptors blockade in patients with high-risk acute coronary syndromes: insights from the PRISM-PLUS study [ J ]. Int J Cardiol, 2005, 100 ( 1 ) :73 - 78.

同被引文献31

  • 1卢竞前,李易,李建美,杨锋,洪云飞,张荣华.经皮冠状动脉介入术中对无复流现象预防的临床研究[J].中国急救医学,2007,27(6):511-513. 被引量:18
  • 2Rezkalla SH,Khmer RA.No-reflow phenomenon[J].Circulation,2002,105:656-662.
  • 3Montalescot G,Barragan P,Wittenbery O,et al.Platelet glycopretion Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a inhibition with coronary stenting for acute myocardial infarction[N].N Engl J Med,2001,21:1895-1903.
  • 4Lee DP,Hefity NA,Hiatt BL,et al.Adjunctive platelet glyeoprotein Ⅱ b/Ⅲ a receptor inhibition with tirofiban before primary angioplasty improves angiographic outcome:results of the Tirofiban Given in the Emergency Room before Primary Angioplasty (TIGER-PA)pilot trial[J].Circulation,2003,107:1497-1501.
  • 5Berger AK,Schulman KA,Gersh BJ,et al.Primary eoronary angioplasty vs thrombolysis for the managements of acute myocardial in elderly patients[J].JAMA,1999,282:341-348.
  • 6Brener SJ,Barr LA,Burchenal JE,et al.Randomized,placebocontrolled trial of platelet glycoprotein Ⅱb/Ⅲa blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction,Reopro and primary PICA Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Invastigators[J].Circulation,1998,98:734-741.
  • 7Stone GW,Grines CL,Cox DA,et al.Comparision of angioplasty with stenting,with or without abeiximab,in acuete myocardial infarction[J].N Engl J Med,2002,346:957-966.
  • 8Yang YJ,Zhao JL,You SJ,et al.Different effect of tirofiban and aspirin plus clopidogrel on myocardial no-refiow in a miniswine model of acute myocardial infarction and reperfusion[J].Heart,2006,92:1131-1137.
  • 9Dimitrijevic O,Stojcevski BD,lgnjatovic S,et al.Serial measurements of C-reactive protein after acute myocardial infarction in predicting one-year outcome[J].Int Heart J,2006,47:833-842.
  • 10Gurbel PA,Bliden KP,Tantry US.Effect of clopidogrel with and without eptifibatide on tumor necrosis factor-alpha and C-reactive protein release after elective stenting:results from the CLEAR PLATELETS 1b study[J].J Am Coil Cardiol,2006,48:2186-2191.

引证文献3

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部