期刊文献+

企业产权制度创新对市场结构及绩效演进影响的研究 被引量:3

Research on the Influence of the Enterprise Property Rights System Innovation upon the Market Structure and Performance
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文量化分析了企业产权制度创新对市场结构及绩效的影响效应,认为企业产权制度从非均衡向均衡的演进,将减少企业内的机会主义行为,企业运行效率将提高,这会传导影响市场结构及绩效的变化。研究结果表明:企业产权制度创新会导致市场结构趋于分散,同时消费者剩余持续改善,生产者绩效可能出现持续增加的态势,也可能出现先减少后增加的局面。本研究综合(包括消费者剩余)评价了产业组织演进的状态,为决策提供了有价值的参考。 This article deeply analyzes the influence of the enterprise property rights system innovation on the market structure and the results by the game the- ories. The writer thinks that the improvement of the enterprise property rights system will lessen the enterprise's opportunist conduct and raise the enterprise's operational efficiency~ which will affect the market structure and performance. The result shows that under the certain condition, the innovation of the enterprise property rights system will cause the consumer surplus to improve continuously, while the market structure will scatter, manufacturer's profits may improve con- tinuously, or firstly reduce then increase. This research synthetically appraises the evolution of the industrial organization,
作者 胡川
出处 《数量经济技术经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第10期98-107,共10页 Journal of Quantitative & Technological Economics
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目"我国产业结构与产业组织的互动关系及政策效应研究"(70473104)的阶段性成果
关键词 企业产权制度创新 市场结构 消费者剩余 The Enterprise Property Structure The Consumer Surplus and provides guidance for decision. Rights System Innovation Market
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Berle A. A. , Means G. C. , 1991, TheModern Corporation & Private Property [M], New Brunswick, New Jersey: Transaction Publishers.
  • 2Vickers John, and George Yarrow, 1988, Privatization: An Economic Analysis [M], M1T Press.
  • 3科斯,等.《财产权利与制度变迁一一产权学派与新制度学派译文集》[M],上海三联书店,1991.
  • 4黄玲文,姚洋.国有企业改制对就业的影响——来自11个城市的证据[J].经济研究,2007,42(3):57-69. 被引量:45
  • 5亚当·斯密.《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》(下卷)[M].商务印书馆,1997.
  • 6埃瑞克,等.《新制度经济学》[M],上海财经大学出版社,1998.

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘小玄,李利英.企业产权变革的效率分析[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):4-16. 被引量:142
  • 2宋立刚,姚洋.改制对企业绩效的影响[J].中国社会科学,2005(2):17-31. 被引量:162
  • 3Jalan, J. and M. Ravallion, 2003, "Estimating the Benefit Incidence of an Antipoverty Program by Propensity-Score Matching", Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21(1): 19-30.
  • 4Lizal, L. and J. Svejnar, 2002, "Privatization Revisited: The Effect of Foreign and Domestic Owners on Corporate Performance", CEBGEEI Discussion Paper, No.2002-2089.
  • 5Megginson, W. ,R. Nash and M. van Randerborgh, 1994, "The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Finns: An International Empirical Analysis", Journal of Finance, 49: 403-452.
  • 6Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1994, "Politicians and Firms", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4): 995-1025.
  • 7Xu, L., T. Zhu and Y. Lin, 2005, "Politician Control, Agency Problems, and Ownership Reform: Evidence from China", Economics of Transition, 13(1): 1-24.
  • 8Garnaut.R,宋立刚,S.Tenev,姚洋..《中国企业的所有制改革:进程、成效及其前景》..中国财政经济出版社,,2006....
  • 9Boubarkri,N. and C. Jean-Claude, 1998, "The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: Evidence from Developing Countries", Journal of Finance, LⅢ(3) : 1081-1110.
  • 10Brandt, L., J. Roberts and H. Li, 2005, "Banks and Enterprise Privatization in China", Journal of Law, Economicz, and Organization,21(2) : 524-546.

共引文献44

同被引文献18

引证文献3

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部