论规范分析的三种实证方法

Three Positivist Methods of Norm Analysis

规范分析这种总的法学方法项下有价值实证、社会实证、规范实证三种具体的实证方法,各自发挥着充实法律的分析功能。价值实证表达着法律的合法与非法问题,在法律规范中、在判例中寻求价值因素对法律的影响。社会实证关注的是法律的调整与效果问题,是规范分析方法中的事实之维。规范分析方法中的规范实证所要解决的是法律中权利与义务的表达问题,因此可以把它视为规范分析方法中的技术之维。

Norm analysis includes value positivism, social positivism and norm positivism, each playing its legal roles respectively in analysis. Value positivism expresses the legal and illegal, seeking for the legal influence in value in the norm of law or in prejudication. Social positivism concerns on the legal adjustment and effect, which is the dimension of fact in the norm analysis. Norm positivism deals with the expression of the legal right and duty, which can be looked upon as the technical dimension in the norm analysis.