构建大湄公河次区域争端解决机制的思考——以区域贸易争端解决机制模式为鉴

On GMS Regional Trade Dispute Settlement Mechanism——Take the dispute settlement mechanism of regional trade as warning

大湄公河次区域经济合作（以下简称GMS）于1992年由亚洲开发银行发起，涉及流域内中国、缅甸、老挝、泰国、柬埔寨和越南等6个国家。对任何贸易体制而言，无论是全球性的多边贸易体制，还是区域性的双边或周边贸易体制，争端解决机制是其贸易规则中必不可少的内容。对GMS来说同样如此。因为，无论GMS贸易自由化规则设计得如何科学合理，若没有一套有效的争端解决机制作为其实施的后盾，6国之间的贸易纠纷就无法得到及时有效的解决，

Any multilateral or bilateral regional trade arrangements and implementation of the actual operation will be the inevitable event of a dispute. Practically, there are three kinds of settlement mechanism for regional trade dispute, including the main political settlement, legal settlement and mixual settlement. Whether the reality of cooperation in the GMS nations, WTO dispute settlement rules of CAFTA and the actual effect of the GMS nations or the characteristics of the original judicial model, the GMS nations can not fully meet the practical needs of dispute settlement. Therefore, absorbing and drawing on the regional trade dispute settlement mechanisms of the advantages, correctly handling the GMS and CAFTA dispute settlement mechanism of relations and realizing the legal dispute settlement mechanism so as to establish a sound GMS dispute settlement mechanism is of great significance.