期刊文献+

丽江:失败的“以钱补污” 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 当前,在经济欠发达地区,村民关注环保的核心仍在于索赔,一旦赔偿到位,即可继续接受污染。这是一种较常见的维权方式,是一种低层次的环保意识。真正的环保行为不以争取经济利益为诉求,而是让企业停止污染与侵害。否则,"以钱补污"的模式将不断拖延治污进程,最终受害者仍是民众。
作者 周琼
出处 《决策探索》 2008年第17期55-57,共3页 Policy Research & Exploration
  • 相关文献

同被引文献14

  • 1陈源泉,高旺盛.基于生态经济学理论与方法的生态补偿量化研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2007,27(4):165-170. 被引量:54
  • 2沈满洪 杨天.生态补偿机制的三大理论基石.中国环境报,2004,8(3):45-48.
  • 3Ma. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: A Framework for Assessment[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2003.
  • 4Ma. Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis[M]. Washington: Island Press, 2005.
  • 5Maryanne G, Porrasa I, Sven W. How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America[J]. World Development, 2005, 33(9): 1511-1527.
  • 6Brown C. Visitor Use Fees in Protected Areas: Synthesis of the North Amercian, Costa Rican and Betizcan Experience[M]. Arlington VA: The Nature Conservancy, 2001.
  • 7Aylward B, Fernandez G. Institutional arrangements for watershed management: A case study of Arenal, Costa Rica[R]. CREED Working Paper no. 21. London: International Institute for Environment and Development / Institute for Environmental Studies, 1998.
  • 8Bulas J M. Implementing Cost Recovery for Environmental Services in Mexico[M]. Washington: World Bank Water Week, 2004.
  • 9Echevarrfs M. Water User Associations in the Cauca Valley, a Voluntary Mechanism to Promote Upstream- Downstream Cooperation the Protection of Rural Watersheds[M]. Roma: Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2002.
  • 10Echevarrfa M. Financing Watershed Conservation: The FONAG Water Fund in Quito[M]//Pagiola E S, Bishop J, Landell-Mills N. Selling Forest Environmental Services: Market-based Mechanisms for Conservation and Development. London, UK: Earthscan, 2002.

引证文献1

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部