从文史分野浅议裴松之《三国志注》

An Analysis of Commentaries on Standard History of the Three Kingdoms by Pei Songzhi from the Perspective of Division of Literature and History

陈寿的《三国志》文笔简练,叙事严谨,但因失于简略,南朝宋时裴松之为之作注,其目的在于拾遗补阙,并弥补其文采不足。汉以前文史不分,魏晋以降,随着儒家思想权威地位的丧失,文学与史学走上了各自独立的道路。陈寿以史家的笔法客观记载三国史实,而文史过渡状态的相互影响,则使裴松之以文学的笔触来为《三国志》作注,以使其"绚素有章",为《三国志》增添了文学色彩,具有较高的文学价值。

The style of ＂History of the Three Kingdoms＂ by Chen Shou is succinct and precise but insufficient. So Pei Songzhi who lived in the South Song Dynasty supplied annotation to it with the purpose to make up the omissions and deficiencies of less literary grace. Before the Han Dynasty literature and history were jointly discussed. When it came to the Wei and separated itself from JiB the Dynasty , the authoritative status of Confucian lost its position, and the study of literature study of history. As a historian Chen Shou objectively recorded the history of the Three Kingdoms. However, influenced by the mixture of literature and history, Pei Songzhi＇s annotation to the book is characterized by his literary brushwork, making it ＂a simple-and-elegantly narrated book＂ with great literary values.