期刊文献+

Conceptual and Pragmatic Motivation as an Explanatory Concept in Linguistics 被引量:2

Conceptual and Pragmatic Motivation as an Explanatory Concept in Linguistics
原文传递
导出
摘要 The concept of motivation has been rejected by many formalist linguists as irrelevant,or at least,negligible.It is argued in this article that motivation deserves a place of honor in linguistic theorizing.After an introduction to various semiotic types of motivation based on previous work by Günter Radden and the present author,constructions with perception verbs in English and Spanish are analyzed.These constructions provide evidence for the hypothesis that lexicogrammatical form is often motivated conceptually.Consequently,contrary to the dogma of autonomous syntax,semantic and pragmatic information has to be built into the formulation of lexicogrammatical regularities. The concept of motivation has been rejected by many formalist linguists as irrelevant, or at least, negligible. It is argued in this article that motivation deserves a place of honor in linguistic theorizing. After an introduction to various semiotic types of motivation based on previous work by Gunter Radden and the present author, constructions with perception verbs in English and Spanish are analyzed. These constructions provide evidence for the hypothesis that lexicogranmmtical form is often motivated conceptually. Consequently, contrary to the dogma of autonomous syntax, semantic and pragmatic information has to be built into the formulation of lexicogrammatical regularities.
机构地区 University of Hamburg
出处 《外国语》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期2-19,共18页 Journal of Foreign Languages
关键词 语言学 语法 翻译方法 英语 自立句法学 inferential motivation lexicogrammatical form conceptual metonymy autonomous syntax perception verbs
  • 相关文献

参考文献48

  • 1Brdar, Mario. 2007. Metonymy in Grammar: Towards Motivating Extensions of Gramrr~ical Categories and Constructions. Osijek: Faculty of Philosophy, Josip Strossmayer University.
  • 2Brdar, Mario, & Nits Brdar-Szabo. 2003. Metonymic coding of linguistic action in English, Croatian, and Hungarian. In: Panther, Klaus-Uwe, & Linda L.Thomburg, eds. Metonymy and Pragmatic Inferencing(Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 113). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins, 241-266.
  • 3Chomsky, Noarn. 1975. Reflections on Language. Pantheon Books.
  • 4Croft, William. 2008. On iconicity of distance. Cognitive Linguistics 19: 49-57.
  • 5Croft, William, & D. Alan Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • 6Colicover, Peter, & Ray Jackendoff. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 7Evans, Vyvyan, & Melanie Green.2006. Cognitive linguistics:An Introduction. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
  • 8Geeraerts, Dirk, & Hubert Cuyckens, eds. 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Cognitive Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • 9Givon, Talmy. 1990. Syntax:A Functional-Typological Introduction. Volume Ⅱ. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: Benjamins.
  • 10Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

同被引文献18

引证文献2

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部