最高法明确反垄断民事诉讼可直接受理被引量：1

下载PDF

导出

摘要最高人民法院民三庭（知识产权庭）负责人日前明确表示，受害人提起反垄断民事诉讼，法院将直接受理。这一说法澄清了外界的一些模糊认识。最高人民法院民三庭副庭长孔祥俊明确告诉《财经》记者，法律并没有规定行政处理是司法受理的前置程序，当事人当然可以直接向法院提起诉讼，并不需要以行政执法机构的处理为前提。

作者秦旭东

机构地区《财经》

出处《财经》 2008年第19期144-144,共1页 Business & Finance Review

关键词民事诉讼反垄断受理最高人民法院行政执法机构知识产权庭模糊认识《财经》

同被引文献14

1齐树洁,苏婷婷.公益诉讼与当事人适格之扩张[J].现代法学,2005,27(5):82-89. 被引量：74
2Kevin J . O' Connor. Is the Illinois Brick Wall Crumbling [J] . Antitrust, Summer 2001 , ( 15 ) .
3See Case T-37/92 BEUC et al. v, Commission(1994), ECR 1-285.
4Mike Redmayne. Standards of Proof in Civil Litigation[J]. The Modem Law Rev, Mareh1999 ( Vol 62, Issue 2).
5John B.Kirkwood and Robert H. Lande. The Chicago School' s Foundation is Flawe& Antitrust Protects Consumers, Not Efficiency[J]. University of Baltimore School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 2009.
6Robert H. Bork. The Antitrust Paradox A Policy At War With Itself (second edition) [M]. New York: Free Press, 1993.
7John B. Kirkwood and Robert H. Lande. The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency [J]. Notre Dame L. Rev., 2005, (S4).
8David Rosenberg and James Patrick Sullivan. Coordinating Private Class Action and Public Agency Enforcement of Antitrust Law[J]. Harvard Law and Economics Discussion Paper No. 523.
9Fabio Polverino. A class Action Model for Antitrust Damages Litigation in The European Union [J]. Law and Economics Review, 2007 ( volume 30, issue 3 ).
10Frank H Easterbrook and Richard A. Posner. Antitrust: Cases, Economic Notes, and Other Materials (3rd ed. )[M]. West Publishing Company, 2007.

财经

2008年第19期

内容加载中请稍等...