期刊文献+
任意字段
题名或关键词
题名
关键词
文摘
作者
第一作者
机构
刊名
分类号
参考文献
作者简介
基金资助
栏目信息

最简方案下虚指词的合并位置及其在句法推导中的作用 被引量：1

On Location of Expletives’ Mergence and Its Functions in Syntactic Derivations in Minimalist Program
下载PDF
导出
摘要 英语的虚指词it和there虽然对于意义的传达无重大影响,但在句法推导中却非常重要。早期最简方案认为,一致关系的核心是标示语-中心语关系;近期最简方案认为,一致关系是限定T与名词表达式之间的一致;一致关系的核心在于不可解读特征的赋值和删除。最简方案在2005年前后的区别之一体现在虚指词的合并位置应该在spec-TP,还是spec-VP,以及虚指词应该是探针还是目标方面。 English expletives, there and it, play a crucial role in syntactic derivations, although they contribute little, if any, to meaning conveyance. Minimalist Program in its earlier versions takes spec-head configuration as the core of agreement relations. However, the latest version of Minimalist Program emphasizes the valuation and deletion of uninterpretable features, and formulates the agreement relation as one between finite T and nominal expressions. Whether expletives are probes or goals and whether they should be merged at spec-TP or spec-VP differentiate the latest MP from its earlier versions.
作者 马志刚
机构地区 广东外语外贸大学
出处 《广东外语外贸大学学报》 2008年第5期59-64,共6页 Journal of Guangdong University of Foreign Studies
关键词 虚指词 合并 成分统制 探针 目标 一致 expletives merge C-command probe goal agreement
分类号 H314.2 [语言文字—英语]
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1[1][4] Chomsky,N.Derivation by Phase[A].In M.Kenstowicz(ed.).Ken Hale:A Life in Language[C].Cambridge,MA:Mrr Press.1999:4,17.
  • 2[2]Chomsky,N.The Minimalist Program[M].Cambridge,Mass:MIT Press.1995.
  • 3[3][6][25] Chomsky,N.Beyond Explanatory Adequacy[A].Unpublished manuscript,MIT.(A published version appeared in A.Belletti (ed.).Structures and Beyond:The Cartography of Syntactic Structures[C].(Oxford University Press).2001:104-131.
  • 4[5]Cbomsky,N.Minimalist Inquiries:The Framework[A].MIT Occasional Papers in Linguistics,no 15 (also published in R.Martin,D.Michaels and J Uriagereka (eds.).Step by Step:Essays on Minimalism in Honor of Howard Lasnik[C].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.1998:89-155.
  • 5[7][8][15][20][21][24][27] Radford,A.Minimalist Syntax:Exploring the Structure of English[M].London:Cambridge University Press.2004:305,297,298,306,304,299,300.
  • 6[9][22] Chomsky,N.Three Factors in Language Design[J].Linguistic lnquiry,2005(1):1-22.
  • 7[10][13] Chomsky,N.On Phases[A].Unpublished paper,MIT (to appear in C.P.Otero et.al.(eds.).Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory[C].Cambridge,MA:MIT Press).2005:5,19.
  • 8[11][12][14][23][28][29][30] Chomsky,N.2006.Approaching UG from below[A].Unpublished paper,MIT.2006:6;5;15;8;12;7;9.
  • 9[16]Chomsky,N.Lectures on Government and Binding[M].Dordreeht:Foris.1981:324.
  • 10[17]More,A.The Raising of Predicate:Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure[M].London:Cambridge University Press.1997:139.

同被引文献25

  • 1唐玉柱.存现句中的there[J].现代外语,2001,24(1):23-33. 被引量：64
  • 2唐玉柱.存现动词的非宾格性假设[J].重庆大学学报（社会科学版）,2005,11(4):84-87. 被引量：29
  • 3潘海华,韩景泉.虚词there的句法地位及相关理论问题[J].当代语言学,2006,8(1):17-35. 被引量：37
  • 4Breivik, L. 1991. On the typological status of Old English [J]. Historical English Syntax 2: 31-50.
  • 5Burzio, L. 1986. Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach [ M ]. Dordrecht: Reidel.
  • 6Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax [M]. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
  • 7Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on government and binding [M]. Dordrecht: Foris.
  • 8Chomsky, N. 1986. Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use [M]. New York: Praeger.
  • 9Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program [M]. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press.
  • 10Chomsky, N. 2001. Derivation by phase [AJ. In M. Kenstowicz (ed.). Ken Hale: A Life in Language EC]. Cambridge Mass: MIT Press, 1-52.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

广东外语外贸大学学报
2008年 第5期

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部