期刊文献+

比较氨氯地平和硫氮卓酮缓释片对高血压病患者动态血压的影响 被引量:1

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较氨氯地平(络活喜)和硫氮卓酮缓释片(合贝爽)对高血压病患者动态血压的影响。方法:选取60例高血压病患者,分别用氨氯地平(5mgqd,n=30)、硫氮卓酮缓释片(90mgqd,n=30)治疗8周,观察治疗前后动态血压值的变化。结果:(1)氨氯地平组和硫氮卓酮缓释片组服药前后(8周末)的24小时、白昼和夜间的平均收缩压、舒张压均明显下降(P均<0.05)。24h、白昼和夜间的平均收缩压/舒张压下降值在氨氯地平组则分别为(10.5±2.0)/(7.3±1.8),(12.8±1.9)/(8.1±1.6),(9.9±1.8)/(6.2±1.4)mmHg,(P<0.05);在硫氮卓酮缓释片组分别为(8.7±2.5)/(5.6±2.6),(10.3±2.5)/(6.3±2.2),(6.9±1.9)/(5.4±2.3)mmHg,(P<0.05),两组间上述指标比较无显著性差异(P>0.05),但动态心率指标硫氮卓酮缓释片组明显低于氨氯地平组。(2)谷峰比:硫氮卓酮缓释片组和氨氯地平组SBP分别为55%、78%;DBP分别为57%、72%。结论:硫氮卓酮缓释片(90mg/d)和氨氯地平(5mg/d)一样均可以维持24小时平稳降压。
作者 林金莺 彭峰
出处 《海峡科学》 2008年第9期94-95,共2页 Straits Science
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献34

  • 1刘力生.2004年中国高血压防治指南(实用本)[J].中华心血管病杂志,2004,32(12):1060-1064. 被引量:2620
  • 2[1]Onose Y, Oki T, Yamachda H, et al. Effect of cilnidipine on left ventricular diastolic function in hypertensive patients as assessed by pulsed doppler echocardiography and pulsed tissue doppler imagine[J]. Jpn Cir J ,2001,65:305.
  • 3[2]Rose GW, Kanno Y, Ikebukuro H, et al. Cilnidipine is as effective as benazepril for control blood pressure and proteinuria in hypertensive patients with benign nephrosclerosis [J].Hypertens Res, 2001,24: 377.
  • 4[3]Miljanich GP, Ramachandran J. Antagonists of neuronal calcium channels: structure, function and therapeutic implication [J].Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol , 1995,35: 707.
  • 5[4]The ALLHAT Officers and Coordinators for the ALLHAT Collaborative Research Group. Major outcomes in high - risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. The antihypertensive and lipid- lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial ( ALLHAT ) [J]. JAMA, 2002,288 (2): 981.
  • 6[5]Anon. Major outcomes in high - risk hypertensive patients randomized to angiotensin - converting enzyme inhibitor or calcium channel blocker vs diuretic. The antihypertensive and lipid - lowering treatment to prevent heart attack trial(ALLHAT) [J]. JAMA ,2002,288(23) :2 981.
  • 7[6]Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers G, et al. Effects of intensive blood - pressure lowering and low - dose aspirin in patients with hypertension:principal results of the hypertension optimal treatment(HOT) randomized trial[J]. Lancet, 1998,351:1 755.
  • 8[8]Hansson L, Lindholm L, Ekbom T, et al. Randmised trial of old and new antihypertensive drugs in elderly patients:cardiovascular mortality and morbidity the swedish trial in olders with hypertension - 2 study [J]. Lancet, 1999, 353 (9 192):1 751.
  • 9[9]Brown MJ, Palmer CR, Castaigne A, et al. Morbidity and mortality in patients randomized to double - blind treatment with a long - acting calcium channel blocker or diuretics in the international nifedipine GITS study: intervention as a goal in hypertension treatment (INSIGHT) [J]. Lancet, 2000, 356(9 227) :366.
  • 10[10]Neal B, MacMahon S, Chapman N. Effects of ACEI, calcium antagonists and other blood pressure lowering durgs:results of prospective designed overviews of randomized trials[J] . Lancet,2000,356(9 246): 1 955.

共引文献10

同被引文献12

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部