期刊文献+

黏性土非线性弹性K-G模型的一种改进方法 被引量:6

A modified method of nonlinear elastic K-G model for clay soils
下载PDF
导出
摘要 为解决《土工试验规程》建议的K-G模型未考虑土体剪缩性问题并保持其简单性,在其基础上增加了一个剪缩模量,建议了一个3模量7参数K-G-D模型,给出了用p和q与εv和εs表示的完整的增量应力应变关系式;通过正常固结黏土的各向等压固结试验和等平均正应力的三轴压缩排水试验标定了模型参数;进行了黏土的常规三轴压缩排水试验,利用模型参数预测了相应路径下土样的体积与轴向变形,经与实测值对比,预测结果较好。该模型可考虑土体压硬性、剪缩性、应变强化特性,能较完善地描述欠固结和正常固结土及松砂和中密砂在等p和增p路径下的变形特性;模型并未在规程模型的基础上增加试验工作,且概念清晰、形式简单、便于实际应用。 In order to solve the problem of reckoning without shear contraction in K-G model suggested by Specification of Soil Test and keep its simplicity, a shear contraction modulus is proposed and a three-modulus modified K-G-D model is suggested which has seven parameters; the integrated incremental stress-strain relations are expressed by mean normal stress, generalized shear stress, volumetric strain and generalized shear strain are given. Model calibration for normal consolidated clay soil is carried out by isotropic consolidation tests and drained triaxial compression tests that the mean normal stress remains constant, model verification is carried out by the drained conventional triaxial compression tests, the computation results by the model parameters coincide well with curves of the tests, which demonstrates that the modified method is rational and applicable. The modified model is capable of reflecting the characteristics of pressure sensitivity, shear contraction and strain hardening, and suitable to underconsolidated and normally consolidated clay soils, loose and medium sands under the stress paths of mean normal stress increasing or remaining constant. In addition, the model calibration does not need additional tests, the modified model is clear in concept, simple in form and convenient to use.
出处 《岩土力学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期2725-2730,共6页 Rock and Soil Mechanics
基金 河南省基础与前沿技术研究计划项目(No.082300410180) 河南省教育厅自然科学研究计划项目(No.2008B560012) 信阳师范学院青年科研基金(No.20070210) 信阳师范学院青年骨干教师资助计划项目
关键词 K-G模型 K-G-D模型 非线性弹性模型 剪缩模量 应力路径 黏性土 K-G model K-G-D model nonlinear elastic model shear contraction modulus stress path clay soils
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1DOMASCHUK L, VILLIAPPAN P. Nonlinear settlement analysis by finite element[J]. Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, ASCE. 1975, 101(GT7): 601 - 614.
  • 2IZUMI H K, KAMEMURA K, SATO S. Finite element analysis of stresses and movements in excavations[C]// Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Numerical Methods in Geomechanics. Virginia, USA: [s. n.], 1976:701-712.
  • 3NAYLOR D J. Stress-strain laws for soils. In: Developments in soil mechanics[M]. Edited by Scott C R. Essex: Applied Science Publishers Ltd. 1978: 39-68.
  • 4BYRNE P M, ELDRIDGE T L. Three-parameter dilatant elastic stress-strain model for sand[C]//Proceedings of International Symposium on Numerical Models in Geomechanics. Zurich, Switzerland: [s. n.], 1982: 73- 80.
  • 5中华人民共和国水利部,电力工业部.SDS01-79土工试验规程[S].北京:水利出版社,1981.
  • 6殷建华.土的三模量增量非线性模型及其推广[J].岩土力学,2000,21(1):16-19. 被引量:10
  • 7高莲士,汪召华,宋文晶.非线性解耦K-G模型在高面板堆石坝应力变形分析中的应用[J].水利学报,2001,32(10):1-7. 被引量:43
  • 8刘斯宏,姚仰平,孙德安,汪易森.剪胀K-G模型及其有限元数值分析[J].土木工程学报,2004,37(9):69-74. 被引量:8
  • 9孙陶,高希章.考虑土体剪胀性和应变软化性的K-G模型[J].岩土力学,2005,26(9):1369-1373. 被引量:15
  • 10中华人民共和国行业标准编写组.SL237-1999土工试验规程[s].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1999.

二级参考文献33

  • 1王靖涛.建立岩土本构模型的数值方法[J].华中科技大学学报(城市科学版),2002,19(1):44-47. 被引量:31
  • 2陈立宏,陈祖煜,刘金梅.土体抗剪强度指标的概率分布类型研究[J].岩土力学,2005,26(1):37-40. 被引量:121
  • 3黄文熙.土的工程性质[M].北京:水利电力出版社,1984..
  • 4俞培基 陈愈炯.非饱和土的水-气形态及其与力学性质的关系[J].水利学报,1965,.
  • 5卢肇钧 杨伟.软土内摩擦角与塑性指数的关系.第一届全国土力学及基础工程学术会议论文选集[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1962..
  • 6卢肇钧.非饱和土强度特性对基坑支护的影响.第二届中国岩土工程发展热点讨论会议[M].广州,1997..
  • 7刘祖德.土石坝变形计算的若干问题[J].岩土工程学报,1983,5(1):1-13.
  • 8高莲士 赵红庆 等.天生桥面板坝灰岩堆石料不同应力路径大型三轴试验及非线性解耦K-G模型验证[J].土石坝工程,1996,1(2).
  • 9孙岳崧 濮家骝 等.不同应力路径对砂土应力应变关系的影响[J].岩土工程学报,1987,9(6):79-87.
  • 10刘祖德 等.应力路径对填土应力应变关系的影响及其应用[J].岩土工程学报,1982,4(4):45-55.

共引文献225

同被引文献66

引证文献6

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部