期刊文献+

不典型鳞状上皮细胞的临床意义及阴道镜再分类的价值

The clinical significance of "atypical squamous cell" and the value of colposcopic diagnosis in reclassification of ASC
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨不典型鳞状上皮细胞(ASC)在宫颈病变中的临床意义及阴道镜检查对ASC再分类的价值,为临床提供指导和管理依据。方法:对412例细胞学结果为ASC的患者全部进行阴道镜检查及定位活检,以病理学诊断为金标准,计算宫颈病变率及阴道镜拟诊的符合率。结果:ASC中包含了各级宫颈病变,其中CINⅠ为29.6%(122/412),CINⅡ为4.6%(19/412),CINⅢ为1.7%(7/412)。阴道镜诊断和病理学结果有较高一致性,Kappa=0.7(P<0.001)。阴道镜对宫颈病变诊断的敏感度为90.2%(148/164),阴性预测值达92.9%(209/225)。结论:ASC中仍有较高的宫颈病变发生率,阴道镜检查对宫颈病变诊断有较高的预测价值。 Objective: To explore the clinical meaning of " atypical squamous cell " (ASC) diagnosed by thin - prep cytologic test (TCT) and the value of colposcopic in reclassification of ASC. Methods: A total of 412 ASC cases was detected by biopsy under the colposcopy to count incidence rate of cervical lesions and the consistency of diagnose of colposcopy with final pathological diagnosis. Results: Of the 412 women with cytological ASC, 122 (29. 6% ) were CINⅠ, 19 (4. 6% ) were CIN Ⅱ, 7 ( 1. 7% ) were CINⅢ. The diagnose of colposcopy had higher consistency with pathological diagnosis ( Kappa = 0. 7, P 〈 0. 001 ) and the sensitivity and negative predictive value for CIN were 90. 2% and 92. 9% respectively. Conclusion: There are high incidence rate of cervical lesions in ASC eases and the check of eolpnscopy is very valuable to diagnose cervical lesions.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第28期3960-3962,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 不典型鳞状上皮细胞 阴道镜 宫颈病变 Atypical squamous cell (ASC) Colposcopy Cervical lesions
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Sara J B, Luis S R, Boniface N. Liquid - based cervical c~ologic smear study and conventional Papanicoloau smears: A meta analysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 185:308
  • 2Prandi S, Beccati D, De Aloysio Get al. Applicability of the Bethesda System 2001 to a public health setting. Cancer, 2006, 108 (5) : 271
  • 3Kurman RJ, Solomon D. The bethesda system fou reporting cervical cytologic diagnosed. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994:30-43
  • 4Solomon D, Nayar R. The Bethesda system for rvporting cervical cytology. Second Edition. Springer - Verlag New York , Inc. 2004 , xxi - xxiii
  • 5郭艳利,耿力,沈晓野,姚燕君.宫颈不典型鳞状细胞意义不明的临床意义[J].中国妇幼保健,2005,20(21):2777-2779. 被引量:12
  • 6赵昀,崔淑慧,任丽华,赵超,魏丽惠.细胞学、HPV高危型检测在宫颈病变筛查中的应用[J].中国妇产科临床杂志,2006,7(2):89-93. 被引量:58
  • 7Lisa Bernard - Pearl, Karen Smith - McCunel Controversies in the management of ASCUS and AGCUS: two very different beasts. Curr Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil, 2001, 24:7
  • 8Kjaer S, H? gdall El, Frederiksen Kl et al. The Absolute Risk of Cervical Abnormalities in High - risk Human Papillomavirus - Positive, Cytologically Normal Women Over a 10 - Year Period. Cancer Res, 2006, 66 (21): 10630

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1]Schiffman MH,Bauer HM,Hoover RN,et al.Epidemilolgic evidence showing that Human Papillomavirus infection causes most cervical intraepithelial neoplasia.J Natl Cancer Inst,1993,85:958-964.
  • 2[2]Walboomers JM,Jacobs MV,Manos MM,et al.Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide.J Pathol,1999,189:12-19.
  • 3[4]Diane Solomon,Ritu Nayar.The Bethesda system for reporting cervical cytology.Second Edition.Springer-Verlag New York,Inc.2004,xxi-xxiii
  • 4[7]Nasiell K,Roger V,Nasiell M.Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up.Obstet Gynecol,1986,67:665-669.
  • 5[8]Denise Zielinski G,Snijders PJ,Rozendaal L,et al.High-risk HPV testing in women with borderline and mild dyskaryosis:long-term follow-up data and clinical relevance.J Pathol, 2001,195:300-306.
  • 6Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R et al. The 2001 Bethesda system: Terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology . JAMA, 2002, 287(16) : 2114 -2119.
  • 7Staff A, Wilbanks GD. An international terminology of colposcopy: Report of the nomenclature committee of the international federation of cervical pathology and colposcopy. Obstet G-ynecol, 1991, 77 (2) : 313-314.
  • 8Bernstein SJ, Sanchez - Ramos L, Ndubisi B. Liquid - based cervical cytological smear study and conventional Papanicolaou smears: a meta-analysis of prospective studies comparing cytologic diagnosis and sample adequacy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 185:308 -317.
  • 9Lisa Bernard - Pearl, Karen Smith - McCune. Controversies in the management of ASCUS and AGCUS: two very different beasts. Curt Probl Obstet Gynecol Fertil, 2001, 24:7.
  • 10Solomon D, Schiffman M, Tarone R. Comparison of three management strategies for patients with atypical squamous cells of undetermined signifcance: baseline results from a randomized trial. J Natl Cancer Inst.2001; 93:293 -299.

共引文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部