期刊文献+

221例超声结构畸形和软指标阳性胎儿的染色体分析 被引量:4

The relationship between fetal structural malformations and/or soft markers and chromosomal abnormalities in 221 fetuses
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:分析胎儿结构畸形和阳性软指标的种类及数量与染色体异常的相关性,探讨超声检查对染色体异常的检出价值。方法:收集3年内超声发现胎儿结构畸形和软指标阳性而行染色体检查的病例221例,统计分析不同类型结构畸形和软指标中异常核型的检出结果。结果:胎儿结构畸形中染色体异常的发生率为30.39%(31/102),其中单发结构畸形、单发结构畸形伴单个软指标阳性及多发结构畸形中染色体异常的发生率分别为17.65%(9/51)、26.32%(5/19)和53.13%(17/32)。软指标阳性病例中染色体异常的发生率为5.04%(6/119),其中单个软指标阳性及多个软指标阳性的病例中染色体异常的发生率分别为3.33%(3/90)、10.34%(3/29)。单发结构畸形伴单个软指标阳性的病例中染色体异常的发生率与单发结构畸形相比,差异无统计学意义(χ2=0.65,P>0.05);多发畸形的胎儿染色体异常的发生率显著高于单发结构畸形(χ2=11.50,P<0.05);多发畸形的胎儿染色体异常的发生率与单发结构畸形伴单个软指标阳性的病例相比,差异无统计学意义(χ2=3.49,P>0.05)。当不考虑是否伴有软指标时,多发畸形的胎儿染色体异常的发生率显著高于单发结构畸形,差异有统计学意义(χ2=11.39,P<0.05)。多个软指标阳性的病例胎儿染色体异常的发生率与单个软指标阳性相比,差异无统计学意义(χ2=1.03,P>0.05)。结论:胎儿结构畸形与非整倍体染色体异常的关系密切,多发结构畸形时染色体异常的风险显著增加。多个软指标阳性的病例与单个软指标阳性相比,染色体异常的发生率差异无统计学意义。 Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of ultrasound in detecting chromosomal abnormalities of the fetuses. Methods: The retrospective analysis included the data of 221 fetuses with structural malformations and/or soft markers from June, 2004 to July, 2007. The karyotype of all cases was confirmed by amniocentesis or cordocentesis. Results: There were 102 cases with structural abnormalities and 119 cases with soft markers. The rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 30. 39% in the cases with structural malformations, 5. 04% in the cases with soft markers, respectively. The rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 17. 65% (9/51) in the cases with single structural abnormality, 26. 32% (5/19) in the cases with single structural abnormality and single soft marker, and 53. 13% (17/ 32) in the cases with multiple abnormalities respectively. The rate of chromosomal abnormalities was 3. 33% (3/90) in the cases with single soft marker, 10. 34% (3/29) in the cases with multiple soft markers respectively. Compared to the cases with single structural malformarion, the incidence rate of chromosomal abnormalities in the cases with multiple structural malformations was significantly higher (X2 = 11. 50, P 〈 0. 05). . There was no significant difference between the cases with single structural malformation and single soft marker and the cases with multiple structural malformations (X2 =3. 49, P 〈0. 05).. However, when soft markers were ignored, the incidence rate of chromosomal abnormalities in the cases with multiple structural malformations was significantly higher than that of the cases with single structural abnormality (X2 = 11. 39, P 〈 0. 05). There was no difference between the cases with single soft marker and the cases with multiple soft markers (X2 = 1. 03, P 〈 0. 05) . Conclusion: Fetal structural abnormalities are closely associated with chromosomal abnormalities. The risk of chromosomal abnormalities would increase when the fetuses with multiple structural malformations.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2008年第28期4010-4013,共4页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词 结构畸形 软指标 染色体异常 产前诊断 Fetal structural abnormalities Soft markers Chromosomal abnormalities Prenatal diagnosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Batukan C, Holzgreve W, Visea E et al. Ultrasound indications of fetal chromosome abnormalities in the 2nd trimester. Schweiz Rundsch Med Prax, 2001, 90 (18): 786
  • 2Michiel C. Van den Hof, MD, Halifax NS R. Douglas Wilson, MD, Philadelphia PAet al. Fetal soft markers in obstetric ultrasound. J Obstet Gynaecol Can, 2005, 27 (6): 592
  • 3TaslimiMM, Acosta R, Chueh J et al. Detection of sonographic markers of fetal aneuploidy depends on maternal and fetal characteristics. J Ultrasound Med, 2005, 24 (6): 811
  • 4D. A. Nyberg, V. L Souter, A. El - Bastawissi et al. Isolated sonographic markers for detection of fetal Down syndrome in the second trimester of pregnancy. Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine, 2001, 20 (10): 1053
  • 5Federico Prefumo, MD, Farah Sethna, Shanthi Sairam et al. First - Trimester Ductus Venosus, Nasal Bones, and Down Syndrome in a High - Risk Population. Obstet Gynecol, 2005, 105:1348
  • 6Boaz Weisz, Pranav P. Pandya, Anna L. David et al. Ultrasound Findings After Screening for Down Syndrome Using the Integrated Test Obstetrics & Gynecology, 2007, 109:1046

同被引文献51

  • 1凌晨,邓学东,刘一琳,王挺,唐亚奇,陆冰,偶健,李琼.胎儿淋巴水囊瘤超声诊断联合染色体核型分析[J].中华医学超声杂志(电子版),2011,8(4):838-842. 被引量:12
  • 2李胜利.胎儿畸形产前超声诊断学[M].北京:人民军医出版社,2011.346.
  • 3张为远.中华围产医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:247.
  • 4Bromley B,Lieberman E,Shipp TD,et al. The genetic sonogram:a method of risk assessment for Down syndrome in the second tri-mester[J]. J Ultrasound Med *2002 ,21(10) : 1087-1096.
  • 5徐艳萍,马小燕,尚宁.颈项透明层增厚胎儿的临床结局分析[J].中华生物医学工程学杂志,2010,16(4) :367-370.
  • 6Nicolini U. Lalatta F, Natacci F,et al. The introduction of QF-PCR in prenatal diagnosis of fetal aneuploidies : time for reconsid-eration[J]. Hum Reprod Update,2004,10(6) :541-548.
  • 7Comas C, Echevarria M, Carrera M, et al. Rapid aneuploidy tes-ting versus traditional karyotyping in amniocentesis for certain re-ferral indications[J]. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med, 2010, 23 .9):949-955.
  • 8Gaudry P,Lebbar A,Choiset A,et al. Is rapid aneuploidy screen-ing used alone acceptable in prenatal diagnosis. An evaluation ofthe possible role of ultrasound examination[J]. Fetal Diagn Ther,2009,25(2):285-290.
  • 9韩瑾,李东至.超声软指标在染色体病产前筛查中的应用进展[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2007,15(12):7-10. 被引量:9
  • 10潘敏,廖灿,李东至,魏佳雪,易翠兴,黎丽仙,胡舜妍,袁思敏,吴韶清.胎儿结构畸形、微小畸形与染色体异常的相关性研究[J].中国优生与遗传杂志,2007,15(12):42-43. 被引量:17

引证文献4

二级引证文献21

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部