摘要
目的:观察七氟醚与氯胺酮应用于室间隔缺损患儿麻醉诱导时的差异,以求找到更适合室间隔缺损患儿的诱导方法。方法:40例行室间隔修补术的3—6岁患儿,ASAⅠ~Ⅱ级,无神经系统及精神疾患,随机分为A、B两组,每组20例。A组诱导采用肌注氯胺酮6—8mg·kg^-1,阿托品0.01~0.015mg·ks^-1,待患儿意识消失后开放静脉,给予咪唑安定1mg,芬太尼10μg·kg^-1,万可松0.8~1.0mg·kg^-1,地塞米松2mg,气管插管。B组诱导采用面罩吸入七氟醚,待睫毛反射消失后开放静脉,给予芬太尼10μg·kg^-1,万可松0.8~1.0mg·kg^-1,地塞米松2mg,气管插管。记录各组患儿诱导时间,诱导时的顺从性评分、血流动力学变化及副反应,诱导后分泌物情况。结果:B组患儿的诱导顺从性评分、诱导时间及诱导后患几分泌物重量B组均明显小于A组,P〈0.01。A组患儿诱导后血压、心率显著升高(P〈0.01)。B组患儿诱导后血压无明显变化(P〉0.05);心率显著减慢(P〈0.05)。B组患儿诱导后血压、心率均显著低于A组(P〈0.01)。A组有2例患儿诱导时缺氧发作,B组患儿未见任何副反应发生。结论:对于室间隔缺损患儿,吸入七氟醚麻醉诱导明显优于肌注氯胺酮。
Objective: To observe the difference between sevoflurane and ketamine during induction in children with ventricular septum defect. Methods: 40 children underwent ventricular septum repair were divided into two groups, each group was 20 children. Children in group A were induced by intramuscular injection ketamine. Children in group B were induced by inhalation sevoflurane to observe induction time, compliance during induction, change of hcmedynamics, amount of secretion, side effect in both groups. Results: Every index in group B was significantly lower than that in group A ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Both the heart rate and blood pressure after induction were significantly higher than those before induction in group A (P 〈0. 01 ), but only the heart rate was significantly lower after induction in group B (P 〈0. 05). Two children had anoxie spell during induction in group A. Conclusion: Sevoflurane is more safely used than ketamine during induction in children with ventricular septum defect.
出处
《中国妇幼保健》
CAS
北大核心
2008年第29期4209-4211,共3页
Maternal and Child Health Care of China
关键词
室间隔缺损
七氟醚
氯胺酮
诱导
顺从性
血流动力学
Ventricular septum defect
Sevoflurane
Ketamine
Induction
Compliance
Hemodynamics