期刊文献+

Ponseti方法在不同年龄先天性马蹄内翻足中的应用 被引量:9

Ponseti method for congenital talipes equinovarus in different ages
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察Ponseti方法对不同年龄先天性马蹄内翻足的治疗效果。方法应用Pon—seti方法治疗先天性马蹄内翻足患儿378例544足,按年龄分为:①新生儿期(≤28d)36例55足;②小婴儿期(29~180d)185例262足;③大婴儿期(181d~12个月)81例113足;④幼儿期(1~3岁)52例78足;⑤儿童期(〉3岁)24例36足。根据病史分为:初治型125例177足;经治型253例367足。对所有患足进行Pirani评分,将0~0.5分判为优良,比较各组的优良率、应用石膏次数及跟腱切断的病足数,并进行随访。结果拆除最后一次石膏时总优良率为97.98%,儿童期优良率较其他年龄组低(P〈0.01),其余各组间优良率差异无统计学意义,经治型与初治型间优良率差异也无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。各组间应用石膏次数差别有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。1岁内各组间行跟腱切断的百分比差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01),新生儿期最多,1岁后各组间差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。初治型应用的石膏次数及行跟腱切断的百分比较经治型明显增多,两组间差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。随访353例512足,随访时间:3个月~5年3个月,平均2年5个月。有67例96足复发,各组间复发率差别无统计学意义,(P〉0.05)。结论Ponseti方法不仅适合CTE的早期治疗,而且对较大年龄的CTE患儿以及经过其他方法治疗失败或复发的CTE患儿近期也能取得较好效果。 Objective To observe the-therapeutic effects of Ponseti method for congenital talipes equinovarus(CTE) among different age groups. Methods Five hundred and forty-four feet in 378 cases of CTE were treated with Ponseti method. According to the age differences, they were divided into 5 groups: (1)the neonatal group (≤28 d) : 55 feet in 36 cases; (2)the younger infancy group (29 d-180 d) : 262 feet in 185cases; (3)the older infancy group (181d-12months) : 113 feet in 81 cases; (4)the toddler age group (1-3 years) : 78 feet in 52 cases; (5)the childhood group (〉3 years) : 36 feet in 24 cases. According to the initial treatment background, patients were divided into two groups: the initial treatment group (177 feet in 125 cases) and the re-treatment group (367 feet in 253 cases). The deformation degree of CTE was evaluated by the Pirani scoring system. A scoring of 0-0. 5 was regarded as excellent. For each group, we evaluated the percentage of excellence according to the Pirani score, the number of casts used, and the percentage of percutaneous achillotenotomy. The results were compared among different groups. Results The percentage of excellence in all patients was 97. 98%,and in the childhood group it was lower than that in the other groups (P〈0. 01), but it showed no significant differences between the initial treatment group and the re-treatment group (P〉 0. 05). There were significant differences in the number of casts used among each group (P〈0. (101). The percentage of percutaneous achillotenotomy showed significant differences between each group before 1-years old, but after 1 years old there were no differences between each group. Both the number of casts used and the percentage of percutaneous achillotenotomy in the initial treatment group were more than those in the re-treatment type. There was obvious difference between these two groups (P 〈0. 01). Five hundred and twelve feet in 353 cases were followed up for an average of 29 months. Ninety-six feet in 67 cases recurred, the percentage of recurrence showed no differences among differ ent age groups(P〉0. 05). Conchtsions Ponseti method is not only suitable for the treatment of young CTE patients, but also applicable for older CTE patients and CTE patients with recurrence.
出处 《中华小儿外科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第9期557-560,共4页 Chinese Journal of Pediatric Surgery
关键词 马蹄足畸形 年龄因素 临床分析 治疗方法 Equinus deformity Age factors
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Ponseti I,Morcuende J.马蹄足:潘塞缇治疗法.Global-HELP出版,2003.4-22.
  • 2杨建平,李德达,龚仁钰,任秀智,孙永胜,刘振英,董梅,周雅媛.早期手法矫正系列石膏固定治疗先天性马蹄内翻足[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2003,24(3):205-207. 被引量:23
  • 3王志刚,蔡海清,陈博昌,杨根兴.Ponseti方法治疗先天性马蹄内翻足[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2004,25(1):55-57. 被引量:47
  • 4Coss HS, Hennrikus WL. Parent satisfaction comparing two bandage materials used during serial casting in infants Foot Ankle Int, 1996,17: 483-486.
  • 5Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA. Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br,2007,89s 378-381.
  • 6Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoeneeker PL Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release. J Bone Joint Surg Am,2006,88..2536.
  • 7Dyer PJ, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006,88:1082-1084.
  • 8Changulani M, Garg NK, Rajagopal TS, et al. Treatment of idiopathic club foot using the Ponseti method. Initial experience. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 2006,88 : 1385-1387.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Cummings RJ, Davidson RS, Armstrong PF, et al. Congenital clubfoot. J Bone Joint Surg,2002,2:290-308.
  • 2Roye DP, Roye BD. Idiopathic congenital talipes equinovarus. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2002,10:239-248.
  • 3Kite JH. Nonoperative treatment of congenital clubfoot. Clin Orthop,1972,84 : 29-38.
  • 4Zimbler S. Nonoperative management of the equinovarus foot: long term results. In: Simons GW, eds, The clubfoot: the present and a view of the future. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1994. 191-193.
  • 5Crawford AH, Gupta AK. Clubfoot controversies: complications:and causes for failure. Instr Course Lect, 1996,45:339-346.
  • 6Herzenberg JE, Radler C, Bor N. Ponseti versus traditional methods of casting for idiopathic clubfoot. J Pediatr Orthop, 2002, 22: 517-521.
  • 7Ponseti IV. Congenital clubfoot: fundamentals of treatment. Oxford University Press, 1996, 231-236.
  • 8McKay DW. New concept of and approach to clubfoot treatment:section Ⅲ: evaluation and results. J Pediatr Orthop, 1983, 3: 141-148.
  • 9Downey D J, Drennan JC, Garcia JF. Magnetic resonance image findings in congenital talipes equinovarus. J Pediatr Orthop, 1992, 12:224-228.
  • 10Pirani S,Zeznik L, Hodges D. Magnetic resonance imaging study of the congenital clubfoot treated with the Ponseti method. J Pediatr Orthop, 2001,21 : 719-726.

共引文献56

同被引文献91

  • 1赵黎,郑振程,武小琳.中文版Ponseti马蹄足治疗法的传播工作在中国大陆正式启动[J].中华小儿外科杂志,2005,26(9). 被引量:4
  • 2汤淙鸿.先天性马蹄内翻足两种保守疗法的护理比较[J].护士进修杂志,2006,21(5):439-440. 被引量:2
  • 3赵黎.先天性马蹄内翻足治疗理念的转变[J].继续医学教育,2006,20(18):42-45. 被引量:6
  • 4Ponseti I, Morcuende J. Clubfoot : ponseti management [ M ]. Seattle : Global-HELP, 2003 : 4 - 22.
  • 5Spiegel DA, Shrestha OP, Sitoula P, et al. Ponseti method for untreated idiopathic clubfeet in Nepalese patients from 1 to 6 years of age[J]. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2009, 467(5) :1164 -1170.
  • 6Alves C, Escalda C, Femandes P, et al. Ponseti method does age at the beginning of treatment make a difference [ J ] ? Clin Orthop Relat Res,2009, 467(5) : 1271 - 1277.
  • 7Lourenco AF, Morcuende JA. Correction of neglected idiopathic club foot by the Ponseti method[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg, 2007, 89 (3) : 378 -381.
  • 8Dobbs MB, Nunley R, Schoenecker PL. Long-term follow-up of patients with clubfeet treated with extensive soft-tissue release [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg(Am) , 2006, 88 ( 11 ) : 2536.
  • 9Coss HS, Hennrikus W L. Parent satisfaction comparing two bandage materials used during serial casting in infants[ J ]. Foot Ankle Int, 1996, 17(8) : 483 -486.
  • 10Dyer PJ, Davis N. The role of the Pirani scoring system in the management of club foot by the Ponseti method [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg (Br), 2006, 88(8): 1082-1084.

引证文献9

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部