期刊文献+

WASCA像差分析仪与主觉验光测量散光的差异及影响因素分析

Accuracy of the WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in astigmatism and its influencing factors
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的分析WASCA像差分析仪与主觉验光测量散光的差异及影响因素。方法分别用两种方法测量360例(组Ⅰ)近视散光患者,比较其散光度数和轴位的差异。从中选出46例(组Ⅱ),分析这些差异与第3~14项Zernike系数(C3~C14)的相关性。组Ⅰ、组Ⅱ各分2个亚组:负柱镜轴靠近90°和靠近180°组(分别称组Ⅰ90,组Ⅰ180和组Ⅱ90,组Ⅱ180)。结果组Ⅰ:WASCA与主觉验光散光度数差值(CA-CS)平均为(0.06±0.30)D(P<0.01);轴位差值绝对值(︱AA-AS︱)平均为(7.4±9.7)°;散光度数低于-0.75D组平均︱AA-AS︱更大(P<0.01)。组Ⅱ:散光度数和轴位差异与C3~C14的回归方程:组Ⅱ180:CA-CS=0.135+1.215×C13;组Ⅱ90:CA-CS=0.153-0.681×C13-0.386×C7+0.790×C10,︱AA-AS︱=1.986+13.043×︱C8︱。结论WASCA像差分析仪与主觉验光测得散光度数接近,但测量低度散光轴位差异较大。次级散光C13对负柱镜轴靠近180°和90°组的度数差异影响相反,后者水平彗差越大,轴位差值越大。 Abstract Objective The aim of present study was to investigate the accuracy of WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in astigmatism and analyze the possible influencing factors. Methods WASCA and manifest refraction was performed on 360 individuals with myopia and the data of right eyes was collected ( group Ⅰ). The cylindrical magnitude and axis differences between the two methods were compared. Forty-six subjects were randomly chosen from group I to study the correlation between those differences and C3 to C14 order Zernike coefficients ( group Ⅱ). According to the axis 45° and 135° ,subjects in each group were divided into two subgroups: negative cylinder axis adjacent to 90°and 180° (group Ⅰ90 ,group Ⅰ180 ,group Ⅱ90 ,and group Ⅱ180). Results In group I,the mean difference of cylinder magnitude between WASCA (CA ) and manifest refraction( Cs ) was (0. 06 ± 0. 30) D ( P 〈 0. 01 ). The mean absolute value of difference of cylinder axis between the two methods ( | AA - AS | ) was (7.4 ±9.7 )° in subjects whose cylinder magnitudes were less than -0.75 D, the mean | AA -AS | was larger( P 〈 0. 01 ). In group Ⅱ,through multiple linear regression analysis combined with stepwise regression,the final multiple regression equations were as follows: groupⅡ180: CA -CS =0.135 +1.215 × C13;group Ⅱ90: CA -CS = 0.153 -0.681 ×C13 -0.386 × C7 +0.790 × C10, | AA - AS | = 1. 986 + 13. 043 × | C8 |. Conclusion WASCA aberrometer is accurate in predicting cylinder magnitude but less effective for the measurement of axis in low astigmatism eyes. WASCA plays opposite effects on cylinder magnitude difference of secondary astigmatism in comparison with manifest refraction in the subjects with negative cylinder axes adjacent to 180° and 90°. The effects of higher-order aberrations on magnitude differences are more comprehensive in the eye with the negative cylinder axes adjacent to 90°, and magnitude of horizontal coma may affect the difference of axis in both two methods.
出处 《眼科研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期784-787,共4页 Chinese Ophthalmic Research
关键词 WASCA 主觉验光 散光 次级散光 高阶像差 WASCA manifest refraction astigmatism secondary astigmatism higher-order aberration
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1Bahar I, Levinger S, Kremer I. Wavefront-guided LASIK for myopia with the Technolas 217z : results at 3 years [ J ]. J Refract Surg,2007,23 ( 6 ) : 586 - 590
  • 2Kremer I, Bahar I, Hirsh A, et al. Clinical outcome of wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis in eyes with moderate to high myopia with thin corneas[ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2005,31 (7):1366- 1371
  • 3Binder PS, Rosenshein J. Retrospective comparison of 3 laser platforms to correct myopic spheres and spherocylinders using conventional and wavefront-guided treatments [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2007,33 ( 7 ) : 1158 - 1176
  • 4Rozema JJ, van Dyck DEM, Tassignon MJ. Clinical comparison of 6 aberrometers Part 2: Statistical comparison in a test group[ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2006,32 ( 1 ) : 33 - 44
  • 5Partal AE, Manche EE. CustomVue laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia and myopic astigmatism using the Visx S4 excimer laser: Efficacy, predictability,and safety [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2006,32 ( 3 ) : 475 -479
  • 6Sanders DR, Schneider D, Martin R, et al. Toric implantable collamer lens for moderate to high myopic astigmatism [ J ]. Ophthalmology, 2007,114 (1):54-61
  • 7Reinstein DZ,Archer TJ, Couch D. Accuracy of the WASCA aberrometer refraction compared to manifest refraction in myopia[ J]. J Refract Surg, 2006,22 ( 3 ) : 268 - 274
  • 8Sahnon TO,van de Pol C. Evaluation of a clinical aberrometer for lowerorder accuracy and repeatability, higher-order repeatability, and instrument myopia[ J ]. Optometry ,2005,76 ( 8 ) : 461 - 472
  • 9Mirshahi A, BUhren J, Gerhardt D,et al. In vivo and in vitro repeatability of Hartmann-Shack aberrometry [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003,29 ( 12 ) : 2295 - 2301
  • 10Wang L,Wang N, Koch DD. Evaluation of refractive error measurements of the Wavescan Wavefront system and the Tracey Wavefront aberrometer [ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2003,29 ( 5 ) : 970 - 979

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部