2Chung E, McPherson N, Grant A. Tensile strength of absorbable suture materials: in vitro analysis of the effects of pH and bacteria [J]. J Surg Educ, 2009, 66(4):208-211.
3Alexander JW, Solomkin JS, Edwards MJ. Updated recommen- dations for control of surgical site infections [ J ]. Ann Surg, 2011, 253(6):1082-1092.
4Wells CL, Henry-Stanley MJ, Barnes AM, et al. Relation be- tween antibiotic susceptibility and uhrastructure of Staphylococ- cus aureus biofilms on surgical suture[J]. Surg Infect (Larchmt), 2011,12(4):297-305.
5Justinger C, Moussavian MR, Sehlueter C, et al. Antibiotic coat- ing of abdominal closure sutues and wound infection [J]. Sur- gery, 2009, 145(3):330-334.
6Galal I, EI-Hindawy K. Impact of using trielosan-antibaeterial sutures on ineidence of surgical site infeetion [J]. Am J Surg,2011,202(2):133-138.
7Sacks BC, Mattar SG, Qureshi FG, et al. Incidence of marginal ulcers and the use of absorbable anastomotic sutures in laparo- scopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass [J]. Surg Obes Relat Dis, 2006,2(1): 11-16.
8Chu CC, Moncrief G. An in vitro evaluation of the stability of me- chanical properties of surgical suture materials in various pH conditions[J]. Ann Surg, 1983,198(2):223-228.
9Hirano S, Tanaka E, Tsuchikawa T, et al. Techniques of biliary reconstruction following bile duct resection (with video) [J]. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci, 2012, 19(3):203-209.
10Tsui TY, Schilitt HJ, Obed A. Prospective evaluation of biliary reconstruction with duct-to-duct continuous suture in adult live donor liver transplantation [J]. Langenbecks Arch Surg, 2011, 396(2):209-215.
