期刊文献+

经皮肾镜取石术后不留置肾盂造瘘管的疗效评价 被引量:9

Efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy without keeping nephrostomy drainage
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价经皮肾镜取石术(PCNL)后不放置肾盂造瘘管的疗效。方法输尿管上段或肾结石行PCNL患者240例。男147例,女93例。年龄19~64岁,平均(48.5士9.4)岁。结石直径1.2~5.6cm,平均(2.8土1.2)cm。患者入选标准:术前无尿路感染病史、单通道、碎石术中无明显出血、无需行二次经皮肾操作者。随机分2组:A组(n=120)术后不放置肾盂造瘘管,B组(n=120)术后放置14F肾盂造瘘管。比较2组患者术后疼痛程度、需应用镇痛药例数、术后住院时间及漏尿发生率。结果240例患者均一期手术成功。A组术后6h、第1天、第2天的疼痛评分分别为4.2±1.5、2.1±1.6和1.2±1.0,均显著低于B组的5.5±2.4、3.9±1.5和2.5±1.5,P值均〈0.01;A组需使用镇痛药者18例,B组为32例(15.0%与26.7%,P〈0.05),A组术后发生尿漏3例,B组28例(2.5%与23.3%,P〈0.01),术后住院时间A组(1.7±0.6)d,B组(3.1±1.1)d,P〈0.01。结论对于无尿路感染、一期手术、单通道、术中无明显出血的患者,PCNL术后不放置肾盂造瘘管可减轻患者痛苦和经济负担、缩短患者恢复时间,是安全可行的治疗方法。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) for upper ureteric calculi or renal calculi without keeping nephrostomy drainage. Methods A total of 240 patients with upper ureteric calculi or renal calculi undergoing PCNL were selected and randomized to receive no nephrostomy drainage (Group A, 120 patients) or a standard (14 F) nephrostomy drainage (Group B, 120 patients) after lithotripsy was finished. Inclusion criteria included no urinary infection history, one-stage operation, single percutaneous tract, no operative bleeding and no need for second percutaneous operation. The pain score, the number of patients requiring postoperative analgesia and the incidence of urine leakage as well as postoperative hospital stay time of the 2 groups were noted and compared. Results Compared with Group B, patients in Group A got lower pain scores at 6 h, 1 d and 2 d after the operation (4.2±1.5, 2.1±1.6 and 1.25=1.0 vs 5.5±2.4, 3.9±1.5 and 2.5±1.5, respectively, P〈0.01), with fewer patients requiring postoperative analgesia (15.0% vs 26.7%, P〈0.05), lower incidence of urine leakage (2.5% vs 23.3%, P〈0.01) and shorter postop- erative hospital stay (1.7±0.6 d vs 3.1±1.1 d, P〈0.01). Conclusion For selected patients, take away nephrostomy drainage right after PCNL could be considered as an effective method to get less postoperative pain, lighter economic burden and shorter recovery time.
出处 《中华泌尿外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期675-677,共3页 Chinese Journal of Urology
关键词 肾造口术 经皮 无管式 肾盂造瘘管 Nephrostomy, pereutaneous Tubeless Nephrostomy drainage
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Pietrow PK, Auge BK, Lallas CD, et al. Pain after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: impact of nephrostomy tube size. J Endourol, 2003, 17:411-414
  • 2Desai MR, Kukreja RA, Desai MM, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of type of nephrostomy drainage following percutaneous nephrostolithotomy:large bore versus small bore versus tubeless. J Urol, 2004, 172:565-567.
  • 3Lojanapiwat B, Soonthornphan S, Wudhikarn S. Tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy in selected patients. J Endourol, 2001, 15: 711-713.
  • 4Shah H, Hegde S, Shah J, et al. Safety and efficacy of supracostal access in tubeless percutaneous nepbrolithotomy. J Endourol, 2006, 20:1016-1021.
  • 5高小峰,孙颖浩,王林辉,许传亮,高旭,盛夏,侯建国.利多卡因加布比卡因局部麻醉在前列腺穿刺活检术中的应用[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2007,28(9):619-622. 被引量:6
  • 6Liatsikos EN, Horn D, Dinlenc CZ, eta. Tail stent versus reentry tube: A randomized comparison after percutaneous stone extraction. Urology, 2002, 59: 15-19.
  • 7Paul EM, Marcovich R, Lee BR, et al. Choosing the ideal nephrostomy tube. BJU Int, 2003, 92: 672-677.
  • 8Maheshwari PN, Andankar MG, Bansal M. Nephrostomy tube after percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Large-bore or pigtail catheter? J Endourol, 2000, 14: 735-738.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Pendleton J, Costa J, Wludyka P, et al. Combination of oral tramadol, acetaminophen and 1% lidocaine induced periprostatic nerve block for pain control during transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Urol,2006,176:1372-1375.
  • 2Hergan L, Kashefi C, Parsons JK. Local anesthetic reduces pain associated with transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy : a meta-analysis. Urology, 2007,69 : 520-525.
  • 3Kaver I, Mabjeesh NJ, Matzkin H. Randomized prospective study of periprostatic local anesthesia during transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy. Urology,2002,59:405-408.
  • 4Alavi AS, Soloway MS, Vaidya A, et al. Local anesthesia for ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: a prospective randomized trial comparing 2 methods. J Urol, 2001, 166: 1343-1345.
  • 5Pareek G, Armenakas NA, Fracchia JA. Periprostatic nerve blockade for transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy of the prostate:a randomized, double-blind,placebo controlled study. J Urol, 2001,166 : 894-897.
  • 6Seymour H, Perry MJ, Lee-Elliot C, et al. Pain after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: the advantages of periprostatic local anesthesia. BJU Int, 2001,88 : 540-544.
  • 7Wu CL, Carter HB, Naqibuddin M, et al. Effect of local ane-sthetics on patient recovery after transrectal biopsy. Urology, 2001,57 : 925-929.
  • 8邓春华,梅骅.前列腺外科解剖学//梅骅,泌尿外科手术学.2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:427-429.
  • 9余发昌,盆部及会阴//徐恩多,局部解剖学.4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1998:137-163.
  • 10王琼,陈晓菲,孙晓雄,冯华.关节腔内注入布比卡因用于膝关节镜术后镇痛[J].中华骨科杂志,2002,22(8):479-480. 被引量:10

共引文献5

同被引文献71

引证文献9

二级引证文献37

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部