摘要
目的:观察中药芒硝加生地榆湿敷与西药硫酸镁治疗静脉输液渗漏的疗效。方法:对我科2006年10月-2007年4月20例患者采用中药芒硝加生地榆湿敷与15例采用常规的西药硫酸镁湿敷静脉输液渗漏处两种处理方法进行疗效比较分析。结果:两种处理方法在减轻疼痛,缓解消肿时间方面有显著差异。
Objective: To observe the curative effect of the wet dressing of mirabilite and Shengdiyu in treating the leakage of venous transfusion. Method: 20 cases were use mirabilite and Shengdiyu wet dressing and 15 cases were use western medicine of magnesium sulfate for wet dressing from Oct. 2006 to Apr. 2007. The efficacy of two groups were compared and analyzed. Result: The two methods had significant difference in the time of relieving pain and detumescence.
出处
《内蒙古中医药》
2008年第9期31-33,共3页
Inner Mongolia Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
关键词
中药芒硝加生地榆
湿敷
静脉输液渗漏
Mirabilite and Shengdiyu
Wet dressing
Leakage of venous transfusion