期刊文献+

预成桩系统修复后牙齿抗折性能的比较 被引量:1

Comparison of Resistance to Fracture of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Three Prefabricated Posts
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较两种玻璃纤维桩与钛合金桩的抗折裂强度及折裂模式,为国产玻璃纤维桩的临床应用提供实验依据。方法收集30颗近期正畸拔除的下颌第二前磨牙,去除牙冠根管治疗后随机分成A、B、C三组,每组10颗,分别用国产玻璃纤维桩,ParapostFiberLux玻璃纤维桩,Parapost钛合金预成桩作桩,复合树脂做核,金属全冠修复。电子万能实验机测试每组试样的抗折裂强度及折裂模式。结果①三组试样的抗折裂强度均值分别为2.917、3.069、1.541,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),前两组的抗折裂强度均高于C组(P<0.05),而此两组间抗折裂强度差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。②三组试样的折裂模式差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论①两组玻璃纤维桩抗折裂强度较高且折裂模式80%为可修复性折裂。②新研发的国产玻璃纤维桩能够满足临床要求并有良好的应用前景。③钛合金预成桩的抗折裂强度较低且折裂模式90%表现为不可修复性折裂。 Objective To compare the effect of 2 glass fiber post systems and 1 titanium on the fracture resistance and fracture patterns of crowned, endodontically treated teeth, providing experimental basis for clinical application of domestically developed glass fiber post. Methods Collected 30 recently extracted, sound human mandibular second premolar with their crowns removed were endodontically treated. Three groups of 10 specimens were formed randomly. Teeth were restored with domestic glass fiber posts,Parapost Fiber Lux glass fiber posts,and Parapost prefabricated titanium posts respectively. All teeth were restored with composite cores, and metal crowns were fabricated. Each specimen was secured in a universal load-testing machine with a special jig to test. Fracture loads and patterns were recorded. Results ①The mean failure loads were 2.917,3.069, and 1.541 for groups A, B and C, respectively. Significant differences were observed on the fracture resistance among 3 groups(P 〈 0.05 ). Group A and B exhibited significantly higher resistance to fracture than group C (P 〈 0.05 ). ②Significant differences were observed in fracture patterns among 3 groups (P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion ①Significantly higher resistance to fracture were recorded for root canal treated teeth restored with group A, B and the majority(80%) showed restorable root fracture. ②Domestic glass fiber post, can meet the requirements for post material and has a promising perspective in clinic. ③When suffering lower loads, the prefabricated titanium posts(90%) demonstrated unrestorable fractures.
作者 张秋霞 康娟
出处 《中国现代医生》 2008年第27期3-5,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 预成桩系统 抗折裂强度 折裂模式 Prefabricated post systems Fraclure resistance Patterns of fracture
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1[1]Goodacre CJ,Spolnik KJ.The prosthodontic management of endodontically treated teeth:a llterature review.Part 1.Success and failure data,treatment concepts[J].J Prosthodont,1994,3(4):243-250.
  • 2[3]Gutmann JL The dentin-root complex:anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring eadodontically treated teeth[J].J Prosthet Dent,1992,67(4):458-467.
  • 3[4]Burgess JO,Summitt JB,Robbim JW.The rexistance to tensile,compression,and torsional forces provided by four post systems[J].J Prosthet Dent,1992,68(6):899-903.
  • 4陈树国,李雅娟.ParaPost(R) Fiber Lux玻璃纤维复合树脂预成桩对根管治疗牙抗折力的影响[J].第九届中国国际口腔器材展览会暨学术研讨会,2005,:238-240.
  • 5[6]Hazaimeh.N.Gutteridge DL.An in vitro stody into the effect of the ferrule preparation on the fracture resistance of crowned teeth incorporation prefabricated post and compmite core trstoration[J].J Int Endodent,2001,34(1):40-46.
  • 6[7]Akkayan B,Gulmez T.Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems[J].J Prosthet Dent,2002,87(4):431-437.
  • 7[9]John MP,Robert GC.Restorative dental materials[J].Louis,2002,11(7):77-78.
  • 8[10]Mannocci F,Ferrari A,Watson TF.Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber,carbon quartz fiber,and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal post[J].J Adhes Dent,1999,1(1):153-158.
  • 9麻丽娟.桩核冠技术修复残根残冠的临床应用[J].中国医药导报,2006,3(24). 被引量:4
  • 10崔玉美,韩晓红.硅橡胶口内衬印制作全口义齿的方法与体会[J].中国医药导报,2007,4(05Z):32-32. 被引量:6

二级参考文献3

共引文献8

同被引文献14

  • 1俞长路.纤维桩研究进展[J].国外医学(生物医学工程分册),2005,28(3):172-174. 被引量:71
  • 2杜仕国.复合材料用硅烷偶联剂的研究进展[J].玻璃钢/复合材料,1996(4):32-36. 被引量:33
  • 3解昱,张振庭.国产碳纤维桩的固位力实验[J].北京口腔医学,2006,14(3):198-200. 被引量:1
  • 4段明丽,陈树国,沈文静,张钊,陈森.不同桩核系统修复对根管治疗牙的影响[J].现代口腔医学杂志,2007,21(3):304-306. 被引量:19
  • 5Stockton LW.Factors affecting retention of post systems:A literature review[J].J Prosthet Dent,1999,81(4):380-385.
  • 6Radovic I,Monticelli F,Goracci C,et al.The effect of sandblasting on adhesion of a dual-cured resin composite to methacrylic fiber posts:Microtensile bond strength and SEM evaluation[J].J Dent,2007,35 (6):496-502.
  • 7Magni E,Mazzitelli C,Papacchini F,et aL Adhesion between fiber posts and resin luting agents:A microtensile bond strength test and an SEM investigation following different treatments of the post surface[J].J Adhes Dent,2007,9(2):195-202.
  • 8Sahafi A,Peutzfeldt A,Asmussen E,et al.Bond strength of resin cement to dentin and to surface-treated posts of titanium alloy,glass fiber,and zirconia[J].J Adhes Dent,2003,5(2):153-162.
  • 9Perdigāo J,Gomes G,Lee IK.The effect of silane on the bond strengths of fiber posts[J].Dent Mater,2006,22(8):752-758.
  • 10Albashaireh ZS,Ghazal M,Kern M.Effects of endodontic post surface treatment,dentin conditioning,and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts[J].J Prosthet Dent,2010,103(1):31-39.

引证文献1

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部