规则悖论与SSK和后SSK之争

Paradox Rule and the Dispute Between SSK and Post-SSK

规则悖论是维特根斯坦《哲学研究》的第二百零一条,主要讨论规则和行动的关系问题。SSK以布鲁尔为代表对规则悖论进行了怀疑式的解读,认为社会约定和利益决定了规则和行动的一致性;而后SSK以林奇为代表对规则悖论进行了反怀疑论的解读,认为规则内在于实践。这两种不同的解读方式展示了后SSK与SSK理论之间的分歧。通过分析,规则内在于实践才是对维特根斯坦的正确解读。

Paradox rule is No. 201 item of Wittgenstein＇ s Philosophical Research which focuses on the relationship between the rule and the action. Represented by Bloor who takes Paradox rules on the conduct of the suspected interpretation, SSK in a suspected interpretation thinks that the community assumpsit and benefits decide the consistency of action and rules. While represented by Lynch who takes Paradox rules on the conduct of the anti-interpretation of Skepticism, post-SSK thinks that the rule is inherent of practice. This two different interpretations show the differences between the theories of SSK and post-SSK. By analyzing this,we believed that ＂the rule is inherent of practice＂ is the correct interpretation of Wittgenstein.