期刊文献+

唐律与日尔曼法刑讯制度比较研究 被引量:1

Comparative Study on the Torture System of Tang Law and Germanic Law
下载PDF
导出
摘要 日尔曼法中的刑讯制度与唐律中的刑讯制度既有相似之点,亦有不同之处,两者在刑讯由谁决定与实施、刑讯实施过程的监督及刑讯实施者责任的规定方面均存较大差异。唐律刑讯制度的官方特色过于强烈,导致唐律对于刑讯过错责任的追究难以落实,这是唐代司法实践中酷刑无法禁止的主要原因,也是中国古代刑讯制度至今仍难以彻底废除的原因之一。 The torture system of Tang Law and Germanic Law embody the similar spots, but also has the different points i. e. in decision maker and executer, the supervision in the implementing process and th e stipulation of the executer' s responsibility. The intense official characteristics of Tang Law inquisition sys- tem by torture causes the difficulty for Tang Law to carry out investigation of the mistake responsibility. This is the main reason that in the Tang Dynasty it is unable to forbid judicature to practice the torture, and also one of the reasons that from Chinese ancient times until now the inquisition system by torture still has difficulty to be thoroughly abolished.
作者 蒋铁初
出处 《西南科技大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2008年第5期6-12,17,共8页 Journal of Southwest University of Science and Technology:Philosophy and Social Science Edition
关键词 日尔曼法 唐律 刑讯 Germanic law Tang law The inquisition by torture
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1[2]Law of Gundobad Ⅶ;LXXⅦ.1-2.
  • 2[4]The Visigothic code(Forum Judicum)BookⅥ.TideI.Ⅲ.
  • 3[7]参见P.D.King,Law and society in the Visigomic Kingdom,Cambridge University Press,1972,P.115.
  • 4[9][13][14][22]The Visigomic Code(Forum Judicum)BookⅥ.TitleⅠ.Ⅱ.
  • 5[15]Pactus legis saljcae XL.6-10.
  • 6[27]The Visigothic Code(Forum Judicum)BookⅥ.Titlel.Ⅳ.
  • 7[24]Law of Gundobad Ⅶ;LXXⅦ.1-2.
  • 8[26]见P.D.King,Law and Society in the Visigothic Kingdom,Cambridge University Press,1972,P.115.

同被引文献25

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部