手背静脉离心性穿刺与常规穿刺效果的对比研究

A comparative study on effect of venous puncture between centrifugal puncture and routine puncture on the back of hand

[目的]观察手背静脉离心性静脉穿刺与常规静脉穿刺方法的效果。[方法]500例住院输液治疗病人,随机分为观察组和对照组,每组250例,观察组采用离心性静脉穿刺,对照组采用常规静脉穿刺。观察并比较两组病人即刻回血、一次穿刺成功和松止血带效果情况。[结果]观察组病人即刻回血率、一次静脉穿刺成功率、松止血带效果均优于对照组(P<0.05)。[结论]采取离心性静脉穿刺输液效果明显。

Objective： To probe into the effect of centrifugal puncture on back of hand. Methods： A total of 500 hospitalized patients accepting intravenous transfusion were randomly divided into observation group and control group （250 cases each）. Patients of observation group were carried out centrifugal venepuncture. And routine venepuneture was carried out for control group cases. The instant blood reflow, one--time puncture achievement ratio and the status quo of unfastening the tourniquet of all cases were observed and compared. Results： In terms of the rate of instant blood reflow, one--time puncture achievement ratio, and unfastening tourniquet effect, patients in observation group were better than that in control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Adopting centrifugal venepuncture for patients accepting intravenous transfusion has significant effect.