摘要
【目的】编制本土文化背景下的具有良好信度和效度的儿童早期家庭养育环境评价量表。【方法】经查阅文献和专家访谈,构建儿童养育环境条目库。在两次中小规模抽样测试的基础上,然后有498名儿童家长完成“一般人口学问卷”、“0-1岁儿童家庭养育环境试用问卷”和“0-4岁儿童神经心理发展量表”测评。对测评结果进行项目分析、探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析、信度检验和效度检验。【结果】“0-1岁儿童家庭养育环境问卷”由32个条目组成,包含4个因素。问卷同质信度克伦巴赫α系数为0.918,分半信度为0.875,重测信度系数0.714;量表与儿童发育商的效标准关联效度为0.506,内容效度和结构效度均达到较好水平。【结论】“0-1岁儿童家庭养育环境问卷”信度、效度等各项指标均达到了测量学的要求,可以作为评价0-1岁儿童家庭养育环境的工具。
【Objective】 To develop a early Child Home Nurture Environment Scales based on Chinese culture background. 【Methods】 The items pools were established after reviewing a lot of correlative literatures and some opened inquiry questionnaire fulfilled by a few experts.After a small and a middle amount samples of investigation,the 498 parents of 3 months to 1 year children were investigated with the demographic information,“0~1 year Child Nurture Environment Probative Questionnaire“ and “0~4 years Child Nerve and Mental Development Scale“.Critical ratio and Pearson correlation to be calculated for item analysis.Exploratory factor analysis and confirmatory factor analysis were used to develop and evaluate the structure of the scale.Reliability analysis and validity were evaluated. 【Results】 0~1 year child home nurture environment questionnaire consist of 32 items,which remain with 4 factors.Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.918.Guttman split-half reliability was 0.875,test-retest reliability was 0.714.Correlation coefficient between total and factors were from 0.637 to 0.912.Correlation coefficient between total score and child development quotient(DQ) was 0.506.Content validity,construct validity and criterion-related validity were satisfied. 【Conclusions】 0~1 year Child Home Nurture Environment Questionnaire is developed.Its reliability and validity are all satisfied and entirely accord with psychometric demands.The scales can be used as a practicable instrument for people to evaluate child home environment.
出处
《中国儿童保健杂志》
CAS
2008年第5期503-506,共4页
Chinese Journal of Child Health Care
基金
山东省医药卫生科技发展项目[(2005)105]
关键词
儿童家庭养育环境
量表
编制
信度
效度
child home nurture environment
scales
development
reliability
validity