期刊文献+

富饶的学术与贫困的思想——马克思主义哲学研究中学术与思想的迷误 被引量:1

Fertile Scholarship and Frail Thought:Academic and Intellectual Confusion in Studies of Marxism
下载PDF
导出
摘要 马克思主义哲学研究不应该仅仅象黄昏才起飞的猫头鹰,它更应该像高卢的雄鸡一样引领时代;马克思主义哲学的研究者不应该像专啃文本故纸的学术书虫,更应该像马克思本人一样做一个振臂高呼的思想斗士。不然,他尽管可以被称为高水平的马克思主义研究学术大家,但不能被称之为真正的马克思主义者。马克思主义哲学研究不应该为学术而学术,而是应该意识到学术与思想的差异,学术不应该是冷冰冰的理性规范和无立场的考证辨识,而是应该在学术中体现思想,以思想关照现实,实现哲学的世界化和世界的哲学化,实现普罗大众的政治经济解放。最终,学者也不仅仅是学者,而是像马克思一样,为全人类的解放和幸福事业而奋斗,从而使自己的生命得到升华。 Studies of Marxism should feature not only as an owl taking flight at dusk, but also as a Gaul rooster leading the times. Marxist researchers should function not only as bookworms gnawing old paper, but also as intellectual fighters crying out just like Marx himself. If otherwise, he may be seen as a mastermind in Marxism, but not as a real Marxist. Studies of Marxism are not scholarship for scholarship's sake, but, instead, ask for awareness of discrepancies between scholarship and thought. Scholarship should never portray itself as rational norms and indiscriminate textual criticism, but should embody thought in scholarship, hold up an intellectual mirror against reality, universalize philosophy and philosophize the universe, thus leading to socioeconomic emancipation of the masses.
作者 袁凌新
出处 《深圳大学学报(人文社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期31-36,共6页 Journal of Shenzhen University:Humanities & Social Sciences
关键词 马克思主义哲学研究 学术 思想 现实 studies of Marxism scholarship thought reality
  • 相关文献

共引文献40

同被引文献15

引证文献1

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部