期刊文献+

数字馆藏评价指标的获取方法 被引量:2

Obtaining Method of the Index Sign of Evaluation of Digital Collection
下载PDF
导出
摘要 文章将数字馆藏评价指标分为了定量指标、定性指标和半定性指标三类。并分析了影响评价指标值获取的因素,在此基础上,分别论述了每类评价或评估指标值可能的获取方法。 This paper thinks that the index sign of evaluation of digital collection divide up into the metered index sign and settle sex index sign and halfs to settle, analyzes the factors to influence obtaining the index sign of evaluation and on this base discusses btaining method of each evaluation or evaluating the index sign value possibility.
作者 杨忻
机构地区 焦作大学图书馆
出处 《图书馆》 CSSCI 北大核心 2008年第5期77-79,共3页 Library
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1ISOInformation and Documentation - International Library Statistics. Switzerland, ISO27892003 (E) :35 - 43
  • 2Julia C. Blixrud. Measures for Electronic Use:The ARL E - Metric Project. [2004 - 03 - 01]. http ://www. arl. org/stats/newmeas/emetrics/index, html
  • 3刘雁书,方平.网络信息质量评价指标体系及可获取性研究[J].情报杂志,2002,21(6):10-12. 被引量:48
  • 4ISOInformation and Documentation - International Library Statistics. Switzerland,ISO27892003(E) :35 -43
  • 5期刊引文报告数据库.[2004—09—04].http://isi4.isiknowl_edge.com/portal.cgi?DestApp=JCR&Func=Frame.
  • 6元智大学图书馆馆藏发展政策.[2004-09-04].http://www.yzu.edu.tw/library/orienation/law/cdp.htm.

二级参考文献17

  • 1[1]Beredjiklian PK,Bozentka DJ,Steinberg DR,et al.Evaluating the source and content of orthopaedie information on the Internet.The case of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2000,82-A(11)
  • 2[2]Ambre J,Guard R,Perveiler FM et al.Working draft white paper:criteria for assessing the quality of health information on the Internet.http://www.metretek.org /hiti/show-case/documents/criteria.html last updated,1999.4.8
  • 3[3]Suares-Almazor ME,Kendall CJ,Dorgan M.Surfing the Net-information on the World Wide Web for persons with arthritis:patient empowerment or patient deceit? J Rheumatol,2001,28
  • 4[4]Gardois P.Evaluating the quality of medical information on the Internet:a brief bibliography.8 ICML Conference Proceedings.Available from:http://www.icml.org/posters/post28.html.Last edited,2000.09.06
  • 5[5]American Medical Association.Guidelines for medical and health information sites on the Internet Principles governing AMA Web sites American Medical Association.JAMA,2000,283(12)
  • 6[6]Growth House Inc.Rating Criteria and excellence awards.http:/www.growthhouse,org/award.html Last visited:2001.4.17
  • 7[7]Searchenginewatch.com.Search Engine Placement Tips.http://www.searchenginewatch.com/webmasters/tips.html Last visited:2000.4.30
  • 8[8]Kim P,Eng TR,Peering JM,et al.Published criteria for evaluating health related Web sites.BMJ,1999,1318(7184)
  • 9[9]Kihlstrom LC.Evaluating pharmacy benefit management information on the Interet:Purpose,Structure,technology,and content.Manag care Interface.2001,14(5)
  • 10[10]Harris R.Evaluating Internet research sources.http://www.virtualsalt.com/8evaluit.html Revised date 1997.11.17.Last Visited.2001.4.4

共引文献48

同被引文献13

引证文献2

二级引证文献59

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部