期刊文献+

在获得和失去情境中儿童风险决策的发展特点 被引量:1

The Development of Children's Risk Decision in Gain and Loss Conditions
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以5~6岁、7~8岁、11~12岁儿童以及大学生为被试,让他们分别在获得情境和失去情境中进行风险决策,以考察儿童的风险决策发展特点。结果显示:(1)在获得情境中,5~6岁组、7~8岁组和大学生组被试冒险、保守决策各占50%左右,11~12)组被试保守决策占60%左右。(2)在失去情境中,所有被试的冒险决策均多于保守决策,但成人的冒险决策更明显。(3)与获得情境相比,在失去情境中儿童更倾向于冒险决策,偏好反转现象普遍存在。 The study was to explore how children make risk decisions. In the situation of gains or losses, 5-6-year-old, 7-8-year- old, 11-12-year-old children and undergraduates were investigated. The results indicated: (1) In the situdation of gains, risk decision was equivalent to riskless decision; however, the riskless decisions of l 1 - 12-year-old children took up 60% ; (2) In the situation of losses, the participants made more risk decisions to avoid loss; moreover, the adults made more risk decisions than the children; (3) Compared to the situation of gains, children made more risk decisions, and preference reversion existed widely.
作者 陈英和 李慧
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期1031-1034,共4页 Journal of Psychological Science
基金 全国教育科学规划国家重点项目(ABA050001) 国家自然科学基金项目(30770729) 北京市哲学社会科学规划项目(06BaJY010)
关键词 儿童 风险决策 冒险 保守 children, risk decision, risk, riskless
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1谢晓非,郑蕊.认知与决策领域的中国研究现况分析[J].心理科学进展,2003,11(3):281-288. 被引量:22
  • 2谢晓非,郑蕊,蔡鹏.风险情景特征对大学生冒险倾向的影响[J].科学技术与工程,2002,2(6):68-71. 被引量:8
  • 3Lola Lops, Oden G C. The Role of Aspiration Level in Risk Choice: Comparison of Cumulative Prospect Thcory and SP/A Theory. Journal of mathematical psychology, 1999, 43(3) : 286 - 313
  • 4Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, Values, Frames. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000 : 17 - 43
  • 5Anderson N H. Schlottmann, A. Developmental study of personal probability. In: Anderson N H. ed. Contributions to information integration theory: Vol3. Hillsdale, Ni: Erlbaum. 1991: 83- 108,111-134
  • 6Levin, P., Hart, S. Risk preferences in young children: early evidence of individual differences in reaction to potential gains and losses. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 2003, 16 (3) : 397 -413
  • 7Schlottmann, A. Children's probability intuitions: understanding the expected value of complex gambles. Child Development, 2001, 72(1): 103- 122
  • 8Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., Vesterlund, L. Subjective probability weights for children and adults over gains and losses. Unpublished manuscript, University of Oregon, 2000
  • 9朱莉琪.认知发展研究的回顾与前瞻[J].首都师范大学学报(社会科学版),1999(4):115-119. 被引量:3

二级参考文献14

  • 1[1]Yates F J, Stone E R. The risk construct: risk-taking behavior. New York: Wiley, 1992:1 - 25
  • 2[2]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 1979;47(2):263 - 291
  • 3[3]Lopes L. Between hope and fear: the psychology of risk. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology,1987;27:255 - 295
  • 4[4]Wang X T. Frederic simons, serge bredart, social cues and verbal framing in risky choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making,2001;14:1 - 15
  • 5[5]Hsee C K, Weber E U. Cross-national difference in risk preference and lay predictions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 1999;12:165 - 179
  • 6[6]Highhouse S, Yuce P. Perspectives, perception, and risk-taking behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes,1996;65(2):159- 167
  • 7[7]Hollenbeck J R, Ilgen D R, Phillips J M, et al. Decision risk in dynamic two-stage contexts: beyond the status quo. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1994;79:592 - 598
  • 8[8]Li S, Admas A S. Is there something more important behind framing? Organizational Behavior a nd Human Decision Processes,1995:62:216 - 219
  • 9[2]Yates J F, Stone E R. Risk-taking Behavior. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 1992. 1~25
  • 10[3]Kahneman D, Tversky A. Choices, Values, Frames. UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000. 17~43

共引文献29

同被引文献12

  • 1Bauer, A. S., Timpe, J. C., Edmonds, E. C., Bechara, A., Tranel, D., & Denburg, N. L. (2013). Myopia for the future or hypersensitivity to reward? Age-related changes in decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task. Emotion, 13(1), 19-24.
  • 2de Neys,W.,&Vanderputte,K.(2011).When less is not always more: Stereotype knowledge and reasoning development.Developmental Psychology, 47(2),432-441.
  • 3Harbaugh, W. T., Krause, K., & Vesterlund, L. (2002). Risk attitudes of children and adults: Choices over small and large probability gains and losses. Experimentd Economics,5(1), 53-84.
  • 4Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 6, 263-291.
  • 5Reyna, V.F., & Ellis, S. C.(1994).Fuzzy-trace theory and framing effects in children's risky decision making.Psychological Selence,5(5),275-279.
  • 6Schlottmann, A.(2001). Children's probability intuitions: Understanding the expected value of complex gambles. Child Development, 72(1),103-122.
  • 7Steelandt, S., Broihanne, M. H., Romain, A., Thierry, B., & Dufour,V.(2013). Decision-making under risk of loss in children. PloS One, 8(1), e52316.
  • 8Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1992).Advances in prospect theory:Cumulative representation of uncertainty Journal of Pdsk and Uneertainty,5(4),297-3 23.
  • 9Tversky, A., Kahneman, D., & Choice, R. (1981).The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211,453-458.
  • 10van Leijenhorst, L.,Westenberg,P.M.,&Crone,E.A.(2008).A developmental study of risky decisions on the cake gambling task: Age and gender analyses of probability estimation and reward evaluation Developmental Neuropsycbology, 33(2), 179-196.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部