期刊文献+

元理解准确性及其与自我调节学习的关系 被引量:2

Metacomprehension Accuracy and Its Relation to Self-regulated Learning
下载PDF
导出
摘要 使用理解评价范式探讨了大学生的元理解准确性及其与自我调节学习的关系。结果发现:(1)大学生能够预测其随后的阅读理解成绩,表明其元理解评价具有一定的准确性;(2)延迟概要组学生的元理解准确性高于即时概要组学生和无概要组学生;(3)具有高元理解准确性的延迟概要组学生对其阅读理解活动进行了更有效的自我调节学习。 The comprehension calibration paradigm was used to probe college students' metacomprehension accuracy and its relation to self-regulated learning. The results showed: ( 1 ) College students' comprehension evaluation was predictive of their subsequent comprehension performance, namely, college students could calibrate their comprehension at a moderate level; (2)Metaeomprehension accuracy was reliably greater for the delay-summary group than for the immediate-summary group and the no-summary group; (3)The higher level of metacomprehension accuracy was associated with the more effective regulation of study.
出处 《心理科学》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2008年第5期1162-1166,1172,共6页 Journal of Psychological Science
关键词 元理解准确性 理解评价范式 自我调节学习 大学生 metacomprehension accuracy, calibration of comprehension paradigm, self-regulated learning, college students
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Brown, A. L.. Learning to learn how to read. In J. Langer & T. Smith - Burke (Eds.), Reader meets author,Bridging the gap: A psycholinguistic and social linguistic perspective. Newark, Det. : International Reading Association,Dell Publishing, 1982
  • 2Nelson, T. O.. A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling - of - knowing predictions. Psychology Bulletin, 1984,95 : 109 - 133
  • 3Glenberg, A.M., Wilkinson, A., & Epstein, W.. The illusion of knowing: failure in the self - assessment of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 1982, 10. 597- 602
  • 4Glenberg, A. M., & Epstein, W.. Calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning,Memory,and Cognition, 1985,11 (4) :702 - 718
  • 5Glenberg, A. M. , & Epstein, W.. Inexpert calibration of comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 1987,15 (1) : 84 - 93
  • 6Glenberg, A.M., Sanocki, T., Epstein, W., & Morris, C.. Enhancing calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 1987, 116 ( 2 ) : 119 - 136
  • 7Maki, R.H. , & Berry, S.L.. Metacomprehension of text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory,and Cognition, 1984,10:663 - 679
  • 8Maki, R,H., Foley, J.M., Kajer, W.K., Thompson, R.C. , & Willert , M. G.. Increased processing enhances calibration of comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1990, 16 (4) :609 - 616
  • 9Maki, R.H. , & Serra, M.. The basis of test predictions for text material. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1992, 16 (4) : 609 - 616.
  • 10Maki, R. H. , & Serra, M.. Role of practice tests in the accuracy of test predictions on text material. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1992,84 (2) : 200 - 210

同被引文献30

  • 1曹锋,朱曼殊.儿童阅读理解监察能力的初步研究[J].心理科学通讯,1989,12(6):20-26. 被引量:8
  • 2李伟健,李锋盈.附加问题对不同类型学生阅读理解影响的实验研究[J].心理科学,2005,28(3):584-587. 被引量:7
  • 3杨双,刘翔平,林敏,宋雪芳.阅读理解困难儿童的理解监控特点[J].中国特殊教育,2006(4):53-57. 被引量:9
  • 4陈启山.元理解监控的精确性及其延迟关键词效应[J].心理科学进展,2007,15(2):295-300. 被引量:9
  • 5Ruth H. Maki, Micheal Shields, Amanda Easton Wheeler, Tammy Lowery Zacchilli. Individual differences in absolute and relative metacomprehension accuracy. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2005, 97 (4) :723-731.
  • 6Jone O, Joanne H, Deborah S. Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehension. Reading and Writing, 2005, 18: 657- 686.
  • 7Svjetlana K, Lgor B. Metacognitive strategies and reading compehension in elementary-school students. European Journal of Psychoiogy of Education, 2006, 4:439-451.
  • 8Keith W. Thiede, Mary C. M. Anderson summarizing can improve metacomprehension Accuracy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 2003, 28(2): 129-160.
  • 9Thiede K W, Dunlosky J, standing the delay-keyword Griffin T D, et al. Undereffect on metacomprehension. Accuracy Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 2005, 3(6): 1267- 1280.
  • 10Thomas D G, Jennifer W, Keith W T. Individual differences, rereading, and self-explanation: Concurrent processing and cue validity as constraints on metacomprehension accuracy. Memory & Cognition, 2008, 36 (1): 93-103.

引证文献2

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部