期刊文献+

列车晚点问题的法律思考 被引量:1

Nomological Thinking Over Train-Delaying
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文描述了迟延发车和迟延到达两类列车晚点的情形,介绍了列车晚点的责任承担方式和状况,分析了法律未明确规定迟延到达类列车晚点之法律责任的原因。本文认为导致列车晚点的原因复杂,应当根据实际情况具体分析,不应一概而论地追究承运人的法律责任。将列车时刻表或火车站公布的到站时间作为格式合同默示条款看待具有合理性,但不应忽视默示条款附有的默示条件。 This paper describes two cases of train-delaying, upon the train's leaving and its arriving, illustrates the ways and conditions of responsibility bearing, and elaborates the reasons why there are no legal prescriptions regarding the legal liability for train-delaying. As causes of traindelaying vary and are complicated, the individual cases should be studied in accordance with the variety of specific situations rather than having the carrier prosecuted for liability. It is reasonable to consider the timetable or the time published by the station as "acquiescent clauses" of the "train tickets" in the format contract, however, it is advisable to remember that "acquiescent clauses" is attached with "acquiescent conditions".
作者 张晓永
出处 《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 2008年第4期79-82,共4页 Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)
基金 北京交通大学基础产业研究中心资助项目的研究成果
关键词 列车晚点 默示条款 赔偿责任 train-delaying acquiescent clauses liability for compensation
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

共引文献1

同被引文献9

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部