期刊文献+

健康教育对恶劣心境患者生活质量的影响 被引量:1

Effect of Health Education on Quality of Life in Sufferer Dysthymic Disorder
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨健康教育对恶劣心境患者生活质量的影响。方法用入院顺序分层随机法,将120例恶劣心境患者随机分为研究组和对照组,对研究组进行个体化健康教育,在治疗前和治疗后1、3、6、12月末,用汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)、总体疗效量表(CGI)和副反应量表(TESS)评定疗效和副作用。WHOQOL—BREF量表衡量患者的生活质量。分析量表中各领域的计分。结果经12个月治疗,研究组的身心健康、心理健康、社会关系、环境因素的分值分别为75.13±6.63,91.44±11.34,90.81±1.66,92.87±11.12,对照组的身心健康、心理健康、社会关系、环境因素的分值分别为70.31±9.37、77.33±9.34、81.56±10.72、80.75±10.82。两组患者生活质量较治疗前均有显著改善(P<0.01),在心理健康、社会关系和环境因素等3个方面,研究组优于对照组(P<0.01)。结论健康教育对恶劣心境患者的生活质量有一定改善。 Objective To investigate the effect of health education on quality of life in sufferer dysthymic disorder. Methods 120 sufferer dysthymic disorders were divided into two groups randomly. The study group carried on the health education of indi- vidualization, Effects and side effects were assessed with HAMD and CGI and TESS respectively, WHOQOL--BREF instruments, were used to evaluate the patients quality of life before and after drug abministration, by menas of analyzing the scores in every do- mains, before and after 1, 3, 6, 12 months treatment. Results 12 months after treatment, the scores of physical health, psycho-logical health, social relationship, and environment in study group were 75.13±6.63, 91.44±11.34, 90. 81±1.66, 92.87±11.12, and the scores of physical halth, psychological health, social relationship, and environment in control group were 70.31±9. 37, 77.33±9.34, 81.56±10.72, 80.75±10.82. and the scores of four domains in WHOQOL--BREF instruments had been im proved significantly in two groups (P〈0.01) In the damains of mental heahh, social relationship and Environment, the study group was better than the control group(P〈0.01). Conclusion The health education has certain improvement to quality of lift of the sufferer dysthymic disorder.
出处 《中国健康心理学杂志》 2008年第10期1165-1167,共3页 China Journal of Health Psychology
关键词 健康教育 恶劣心境 生活质量 副反应量表 Health education Dysthymic disorder Quality of life TESS
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1中华医学会精神科分会.中国精神障碍分类与诊断标准(第3版)[M].济南:山东科学技术出版社,2001.87-90.
  • 2World Health Orgnieation. WHOQOL Bref introduction. Administaration, scoring and generic version of the assessment, field trial version. Progamme on mental Henlth. WHO: Geneva, 1996 : 1-11
  • 3戴喜玲,赵永青.对精神病人进行健康教育的思路[J].中华护理杂志,1998,33(7):425-426. 被引量:122
  • 4孙克莎,董萍,李枫,何方,朱明珍.慢性精神分裂症与老年痴呆病人互助康复训练的研究[J].中华护理杂志,2003,38(9):676-678. 被引量:13
  • 5Williams J. McGuffin P, Nothen M. et al. Meta analysis of association between the 5-HT2A receptor T102C polymorphism and sufferer dysthymic disorder. Lancet, 1997,349: 1221
  • 6Smit D, Dempster C. Glanville J. et al. Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants : a meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry, 2002,180 : 396-404.
  • 7Goyne JC, Downey Gstress, social support and the copino process, Ann Rev Psychology. 1991 (42) : 401-426
  • 8Gessa GL. Dysthymia and dysthymic disorders; dopamine hypothesis. Ear Psychiatry, 1996,11csupp(3):1235-1275
  • 9Lambert G, Johansson M. Agren H, et al. Reduced brain nore pinephrine and dopamine release in treatment refractory depressive illness: Evidence in support of cat eeholamine hypothesis of mood disorders. Arch Gen Psychiatry, 2000,57:787-793

二级参考文献5

共引文献238

同被引文献8

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部