期刊文献+

艾滋病流行病学调查中信度问题及常用指标

The reliability of HIV/AIDS related questionnaire surveys and estimation of commonly used indexes
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨艾滋病调查问卷信度估计方法的应用。方法结合实例对调查问卷中的可靠性问题进行分析。结果外在信度测量时,在一次对青少年性行为的重复调查中,重测信度Kappa值为0.801;在一次艾滋病知识问卷调查的复本信度为0.917(P<0.01);内在信度测量时,一份艾滋病知识问卷的分半信度为0.747;在一组对艾滋病病毒感染者态度调查问卷中,克朗巴哈系数为0.808。结论各个信度指标均有一定的适用性,可应用于艾滋病调查问卷的可靠性评估。 Objective To explore the application of reliability analysis of HIV/AIDS related questionnaire surveys Method The reliability of HIV/AIDS related surveys were analyzed by using some practical questionnaire examples Resuits In the external reliability analysis, the test-retest reliability index kappa value was 0.801 between the two surveys of sex behavior in the adolescent, In one AIDS related knowledge questionnaire survey the alternative-form reliability index was 0.917 (P 〈 0.01); In the internal reliability analysis,the split-half reliability of a HIV-related knowledge questionnaire was 0.747, and Cronbach' s alpha coefficient of an attitude survey among HIV positive persons was 0. 808. Conclusion The reliability indexes can be applied in evaluating the reliability of HIV/AIDS related questionnaire surveys
出处 《中国艾滋病性病》 CAS 2008年第5期457-460,共4页 Chinese Journal of Aids & STD
关键词 艾滋病 信度 问卷 KAPPA值 克朗巴哈系数 AIDS Reliability Questionnaire Kappa value Cronbach' s alpha coefficient
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

二级参考文献23

  • 1李进,况伟宏,马渝根,廖菁.HIV感染者/AIDS病人及其家属的生活质量调查及相关因素分析[J].中国循证医学杂志,2004,4(8):550-552. 被引量:16
  • 2王海军,徐克静.问卷调查中的信度和效度问题[J].中国健康教育,1994,10(11):21-23. 被引量:27
  • 3杨翌,张孔来,李泽荣,王克荣,阎会文,赵宇腾,许雅.艾滋病病毒感染者生活质量与相关耻辱的关系[J].中国公共卫生,2005,21(6):675-676. 被引量:52
  • 4Carmines EG, Zeller RA. Reliability and validity assessment. California,SAGE publications, Inc, 1979, 37-51.
  • 5McDonald RP. Test theory: a unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 1999, 63-95.
  • 6Raykov T. Analytic estimation of standard error and confidence interval for scale reliability. Multivariate Behavior Research, 2002, 37 ( 1 ) : 89-103.
  • 7Pithers RT, Soden R. Scottish and Australian teacher stress and strain: a comparative study. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 1998, 68 (3) :269-279.
  • 8SAS Institute Inc. SAS/STAT User' s guide, Version 6. Cary, NC, SAS Institute Inc, 1990, 435-632.
  • 9Bollen KA, Latent Variables in Psychology and the Social Sciences. Annu-M Review of Psychology, 2002, 53 (4) :605-634.
  • 10Hogan TP, Benjamin A, Berzinski KL. Reliability methods:A note on the frequency of use of various types. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 2000, 60(5) :523-531.

共引文献112

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部