期刊文献+

牙预备体用BisBlock^(TM)脱敏对水门汀剪切强度的影响

Effects of BisBlock^(TM) desensitizer used on basement tooth on shearing strength of cements.
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:评价BisBlockTM脱敏剂对4种水门汀粘接强度的影响。方法:对48个离体牙片进行牙体预备,暴露牙本质,随机分4组:聚羧酸锌水门汀组、玻璃离子水门汀组、树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀组、树脂水门汀组,每组12个样本。一半样本为实验组,涂用BisBlockTM脱敏剂;对照组不涂脱敏剂。用水门汀粘固镍铬合金铸件于牙本质表面。剪切实验后记录剪切强度及离断类型。采用t检验分析实验组和对照组间的剪切强度,采用Pearson's卡方检验分析离断面类型数据(α=0.05)。结果:BisBlockTM可提高树脂加强型玻璃离子水门汀和树脂水门汀的剪切强度,与树脂水门汀联合应用后剪切强度达到最大(13.04±2.76)MPa。结论:脱敏剂对水门汀粘接强度的影响与其产品成分有关;BisBlockTM脱敏剂可与实验中所有水门汀联合应用。 Objective:To evaluate the effects of BisBlock^TM desensitizer on shearing strength of 4 cements. Method:48 semi-teeth were operated to expose the dentin. The samples were divided to 4 groups at random: Zinc polycarboxylate cements group(ZPCC),Glass ionomer cements group(GIC),Resin-modified glass ionomer cements group(RMGIC),Resin cements group(RC). Each group concluded 12 specimens,half of them applied the BisBlock^TM desensitizer on the pretreated tooth,the others were control group with no desensitizer. Then cemented Ni-Cr alloy castings to the dentin with different cements. The shearing strength of all specimens were measured,and the failure type was recorded too. The shearing strength were analyzed with Independent Samples T Test between experiment group and control group,and the type of failure was analyzed with the Pearson's chi-square test(α=0.05). Result:BisBlock^TM enhanced the shearing strength of RMGIC and RC,and the best shearing strength was found when BisBlock^TM combined with RC(13.04±2.76)MPa. Conclusion:The effect of BisBlock^TM desensitizer on bonding strength of different cements is related to the composition of desensitizer. BisBlock^TM could use in combination with all cements in this study.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2008年第9期544-546,共3页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 脱敏剂 水门汀 剪切强度 牙本质粘接 desensitizer cements shear strength bonding to dentin
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Gillam DG, Newman HN, Davies EH, et al. Clinical evaluation of ferric oxalate in relieving dentine hypersensitivity [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2004, 31 (3) : 245-250.
  • 2Pamir T,ozyazici M,Baloglu E,et al. The efficacy of three desensitizing agents in treatment of dentine hypersensitivity [J]. J Clin Pharm Ther, 2005,30 (1) : 73-76.
  • 3Macari S,Goncalves M,Nonaka T, et al. Scanning Electron Microscopy Evaluation of the Interface of Three Adhesive Systems [J]. Braz Dent J, 2002, 13 (1) : 33-38.
  • 4Johnson GH,Lepe X, Bales DJ. Crown retention with use of a 5% glutaraldehyde sealer on prepared dentin [J]. J Prosthet Dent, 1998,79 (6) : 671-676.
  • 5Wang L, Sakai VT, Kawai BS, et al. Effect of adhesive systems associated with resin-modified glass ionomer cements [J]. J Oral Rehabil,2006, 33 (2) : 110-116.
  • 6Wolfart S, Linnemann J, Kern M. Crown retention with use of different sealing systems on prepared dentine [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 2003,30 (11) : 1053-61.
  • 7Gillam DG, Mordan NJ, Sinodinou AD,et al. The effects of oxalatecontaining products on the exposed dentine surface: an SEM investigation [J]. J Oral Rehabih 2001,28 (11) : 1037-44.
  • 8Ling TYY, Gillam DG, Barber PM, et al. An investigation of potential desensitizing agents in the dentine disc model: a scanning electron microscopy study [J]. J Oral Rehabil, 1997,24 (3): 191-203.
  • 9Pereira JC, Segala AD, Gillam DG. Effect of desensitizing agents on the hydraulic conductance of human dentin subjected to different surface pre-treatments-an in vitro study [J]. Dent Mater,2005,21 (2) : 129-138.
  • 10Yiu CKY, Hiraishi N, Chersoni S, et al. Single-bottle adhesives behave as permeable membranes after polymerization.Ⅱ.Differential permeability reduction with an oxalate desensitizer [J]. J Dent, 2006 ,34 (2) : 106-116.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部