期刊文献+

胆总管浸润对Vater壶腹腺癌胰十二指肠切除预后的影响

Prognostic implication of common bile duct infiltration in adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater after pancreaticoduodenectomy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究胆总管浸润对Vater壶腹腺癌胰十二指肠切除的预后影响。方法回顾性分析胰十二指肠切除后存活的102例Vater壶腹腺癌患者的临床病理和生存资料,比较胆总管浸润和无浸润之间的差异。结果T1期9例(8.8%),他期40例(39.2%),13期25例(24.5%),T4期28例(27.5%);NO76例(74.5%),N1 26例(25.5%)。TNM分期Ⅰ期42例(41.2%),Ⅱ期32例(31.3%),Ⅲ期27例(26.5%),Ⅳ期1例(1.0%)。胆总管浸润26例(25.5%),无胆总管浸润76例(74.5%)。胆总管浸润组出现胰腺浸润22例(84.6%),无胆总管浸润组为26例(34.2%),差异有统计学意义(x^2=19.78,P〈0.001)。全组有25例(24.5%)出现复发转移,中位复发转移时间为20(2~93)个月。无胆总管浸润组患者的术后中位无复发生存期和总体生存期显著优于胆总管浸润组。结论胆总管浸润的Vater壶腹癌患者易出现胰腺浸润,无复发生存期和总体生存期显著下降,患者术后应该接受综合治疗。 Objective To investigate the prognostic implication of common bile duct infiltration in the adenocarcinoma of the ampulla of Vater after panreaticoduodenectomy. Methods A retrospective study was conducted on clinical manifestation, pathological behavior and survival data in 102 patients with Vater's ampulla adenocarcinoma, who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy from Jan 1980 to Dec 2003. The result of patients with the common bile duct infiltration were compared with that of those without. Results There were 42 cases in stage Ⅰ (41.2%), 32 in stage Ⅱ (31.3%), 27 in stage Ⅲ (26.5%), and 1 in stage Ⅳ (1.0%). As for T stage : 9 cases in stage T1 (8.8%),40 in T2 (39.2%),25in T3 (24.5%), and 28 in T4 (27.5%). As regarding to N stage: 76 cases in stage NO (74.5%) and 26 in N1 (25.5%). Of these 102 cases, microscopic infiltration in the common bile duct (25.0%) was identified in 26 cases. A significant difference was observed between the patients with bile duct infiltration and those without, in the proportion of pancreatic medullae infiltration: 84.6% ( infiltration group) versus 34.2% ( non-infiltration group, P 〈 0. 001 ). Twenty-five cases (24.5%) had recurrence and/or metastases postoperatively, with a median survival of 20 months ( range, 2 to 93 months). The overall median survival of the whole group was 46.0 months (2 - 192 months) , with a significant difference between the common bile duct infiltration group (36 months) and the non-infiltration group (49 months, P = 0. 0061 ). The median non-recurrence survival of the whole group was 43 months (2 -192 months), and a significant difference was observed between the common bile duct infiltration group (35 months) and non-infiltration group ( 47 months, P = 0. 0002). Conclusion If the adenocarcinoma of the Vater's ampulla infiltrated the common bile duct, the invasion to the pancreatic medulla is likely developed, and usually with a poor non-recurrence and overall survival. Therefore, postoperative chemotherapy/radiotherapy is suggested.
出处 《中华肿瘤杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期775-778,共4页 Chinese Journal of Oncology
关键词 VATER壶腹 腺癌 胆总管浸润 胰十二指肠切除 预后 Ampulla of Vater Adenocarcinoma Common bile duct infiltration Panceaticoduodenectomy Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Avisse C, Flament JB, Delattre JF. Ampulla of Vater: anatomic, embryologic, and surgical aspects. Surg Clin North America, 2000, 80:201-212.
  • 2Goodman MT, Yamamoto J. Descriptive study of gallbladder, gallbladder,extrahepatic bile and ampunary cancers in the United States, 1997- 2002. Cancer Causes Control, 2007, 18:415-422.
  • 3鲁志诚,郭剑民,张云利,田培林,张林,俞江平,包晓燕.超声内镜对胰腺及壶腹癌术前分期及可切除性的评估[J].中华肿瘤杂志,2006,28(6):441-444. 被引量:5
  • 4Evans DB, Wolff RA. Neoplasms of the ampulla of Vater//Bast CB, Kufe DW, Pollock RE, Eds. Cancer Medicine. 北京:人民卫生出版社.2001:1431-1435.
  • 5Lee SY, Jang KT, Lee KT, et al. Can endoscopic resection be applied for early stage ampulla of Vater cancer? Gastrointest Endosc, 2006, 63:783-788.
  • 6Bucher P, Chassot G, Durmishi Y, et al. Long-term results of surgical treatment of Vater's ampulla neoplasms. Hepatogastroenterology, 2007, 54 : 1239-1242.
  • 7Yamada S, Fujii T, Sugimoto H, et al. A proposal of an appropriate surgical approach for cancer of the ampulla of Vater: retrospective analysis of 73 resected cases. Hepatogastroenterology, 2007, 54 : 10-14.
  • 8Fiori E, Macchiarelli G, Schillaci A, et al. Hepatocyte ultrastructural aspects after preoperative biliary drainage in pancreatic cancer patients with cholestatic jaundice. Anticancer Res, 2003, 23: 4859-4863.
  • 9Sewnath ME, Karsten TM, Prins MH, et al. A meta analysis on the efficacy of preoprative bilairy drainage for tumors causing obstructive jaundice. Ann Surg, 2002, 236 : 17-27.
  • 10Kim RD, Kundhal PS, McGilvray ID, et al. Predictors of failure after pancreaticoduodenectomy for ampullary carcinoma. J Am Coil Surg, 2006, 202:112-119.

二级参考文献16

  • 1Ahmad NA, Lewis JD, Ginsberg GG, et al. EUS in preoperative staging of pancreatic cancer. Gastrointest Endosc, 2000, 52 : 463-468.
  • 2Hunt GC, Faigel DO. Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging,and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: a review.Gastrointest Endosc, 2002, 55:232-237.
  • 3Muller MF, Meyenterger C, Bertschinger P, et al. Pancreatic tumors: evaluation with endoscopic US, CT and MR imaging.Radiology, 1994, 190:745-751.
  • 4palazzo L, Roseau G, Guyet Bet al. Endoscopic ultrasonography in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: results of a prospective study with comparison to ultrasomography and CT scan.Endoscopy, 1993, 25:143-150.
  • 5Awad SS, Colletti L, Mulholland M, et al. Muhimodality staging optimizes resectability in patients with pancreatic and ampullary cancer. Am J Surg, 1997, 63: 634-648.
  • 6Buseail L, Pages P, Berthelemy P, et al. Role of EUS in the management of pancreative and ampullary carcinoma: a prospective study assessing reseetability and prognosis. Gastrointest Endosc,1999, 50:34-40.
  • 7Akahoshi K, Chijiiwa Y, Nakano I, et al. Diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer by endoscopic ultrasound. Br J Radiol, 1998, 71 :492-496.
  • 8Fleming ID, Cooper JS. Exocrine pancreas. In: AJCC Cancer staging manual. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1997.121-124.
  • 9Union International Contra la Cancrum. TNM clsasification of malignant turnouts. 4th ed. 2nd revision. Berlin: Springer, 1992.10-11.
  • 10Palazzo L, Giovannini M, Buscail L. Assessing resectability of pancreatic cancers by endoscopic uhrasonog Taphy: criteria forevaluation and performances. Acta Endosc, 1996, 26:331-343.

共引文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部