期刊文献+

基于场景的两种软件体系结构评估方法 被引量:3

Two software architecture evaluation methods based on scenario
下载PDF
导出
摘要 基于场景的软件体系结构评估方法通过场景将系统的质量需求转换为风险承担者与系统的交互活动,通过低代价的事前评估活动降低软件的质量风险。SAAM及ATAM两种方法在具体的实际评估活动中,它们在场景的生成、风险承担者的商业动机的表述、软件体系结构的描述等方面存在着很大的不同,两种评估方法各有特长,其评估方法在具体的场景执行环节上具有不确定性,将定量的度量方法与定性场景结合是提高评估的有效途径。 Software architecture evaluation methods switch quality demand to interaction between risk-receivers and the system. Advancing evaluation could reduce quality risk when software was designed. SAAM and ATAM were two different evaluation methods which have their merits when applied in creating scenario, describing business motivation and software architecture and so on. Neither methods can' t ensure certainty when applied in particular performance, so it is an effective way to combine quantitative methods and scenario qualitative evaluation.
作者 沈群力 刘杰
出处 《计算机应用研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2008年第10期3015-3017,共3页 Application Research of Computers
基金 上海市政府重点学科建设基金资助项目(沪教委科(2006)47)
关键词 场景 软件体系结构 软件体系结构分析法 体系结构权衡分析法 效用树 scenario software architecture software architecture analysis method architecture tradeoff analyis method utility tree
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1BASS L, CLEMENTS P,KAZMAN R. Software architecture in practice [ M]. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley, 2002.
  • 2刘霞,李明树,王青,周津慧.软件体系结构分析与评价方法评述[J].计算机研究与发展,2005,42(7):1247-1254. 被引量:15
  • 3沈群力,刘渊,姜卫.微支付系统解决方案的研究[J].安徽大学学报(自然科学版),2002,26(3):29-32. 被引量:8
  • 4沈群力,唐思章,刘杰.基于微支付协议的网络认证协议[J].上海商学院学报,2006,7(1):27-30. 被引量:3
  • 5沈群力.《信息系统分析与设计》实验教学探讨[J].实验科学与技术,2007,5(2):84-86. 被引量:11
  • 6GRIMANA A, PEREZA M, MENDOZA L, et al. Feature analysis for architectural evaluation methods[J]. The Journal of Systems and Software, 2006, 79 (2) :871-888.
  • 7OLUMOFIN F G, MISIO V B. A holistie architecture assessment method for software product lines [ J ]. Information and Software Technology, 2007, 49(4): 309-323.
  • 8LOPEZ M. Application of an evaluation framework for analyzing the architecture tradeoff analysis method^TM [ J ]. The Journal of Systems and Software,2003,68 (12) : 233-241.
  • 9ARES J, GARCIA R, JURISTO R, et al. A more rigorous and comprehensive approach to software process assessment [ J ]. Software Process: Improvement and Practice, 2000, 5 (1) :3-30.
  • 10CLEMENTS P, KAZMAN R. Valuating software architecture methods and case studies [M].[S. l.] :Addison-Wesley, 2002:235-241.

二级参考文献45

  • 1Gary P.Schneider James.Electroic Commerce(英文版)[M].北京:机械工业出版社,2001,4(1)..
  • 2[1]Electronic Payment Systems for E-Commerce,Donal O'Mahony,Michael Pierce,Hitesh Tewari,ISBN:1-58053-268-3.
  • 3[2]White Paper:The Millicent Protocol for inexpensive Electronic Commerce,Steve Glassman,Mark Manasse,http://www.millicent.com.
  • 4[4]J.Kohl,C.Neuman,The Kerberos Network Authentication Service (V5),IETF RFC 1510,URL:gopher://ds2.internic.net/00/rfc/rfc1510.txt.
  • 5[5]Jennifer G.Steiner,Clifford Neuman,and Jerrfey I.Schiller."Kerberos:An Authentication Service for Open Network Systems."Proceedings of the 1988 USENIX Winter Conference,February 1988,Dallas,Texas,Pages 191-202.
  • 6[6]RFC 1321 "The MD5 Message -Digest Algorithm",Internet Request for Comments 1321,R.L.Rivest,Apr.1992.
  • 7L. Bass, P. Clements, et al. Software Architecture in Practice.
  • 8nd edition. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional, 20032.R. Kazaman, L. Bass, et al. Analyzing the properties of user interface software architecture. Carnegie Mellon Univ., Tech.Rep.: CMU-CS-93-201, 1993
  • 9P. Kruchten. Architecture blueprints-The 4 + 1 view model of software architecture. IEEE Software, 1995, 12(6): 42~50
  • 10D. Soni, R. Nord, C. Hofmeister. Software architecture in industrial applications. In: Proc. the 17th Int'l Conf. Software Engineering. New York: ACM Press, 1995. 196~207

共引文献31

同被引文献31

  • 1沈群力,唐思章,刘杰.基于微支付协议的网络认证协议[J].上海商学院学报,2006,7(1):27-30. 被引量:3
  • 2刘霞,李明树,王青,周津慧.软件体系结构分析与评价方法评述[J].计算机研究与发展,2005,42(7):1247-1254. 被引量:15
  • 3史创明,王立新.数字签名及PKI技术原理与应用[J].微计算机信息,2005,21(06X):122-124. 被引量:32
  • 4梅宏,申峻嵘.软件体系结构研究进展[J].软件学报,2006,17(6):1257-1275. 被引量:140
  • 5BANANI R,GRAHAM N. Methods for evaluating software architecture:a survey,Technical Report 2008-545[R].Kingston:Queen' s University,2008.1-82.
  • 6BREIVOLD H P,CRNKOVIC I. A systematic review of software architecture evolution research[J].Information and Software Technology,2012,(01):16-40.
  • 7HEIKO K. Sustainability evaluation of software architectures:a systematic review[A].New York:acm Press,2011.3-12.
  • 8DOBRICA L,NIEMELA E. A survey on software architecture analysis methods[J].IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering,2002,(07):638-653.doi:10.1109/TSE.2002.1019479.
  • 9RICK K,MARK K,MARIO B. The architecture tradeoff analysis method[A].Washington,DC:IEEE Computer Society,1998.68-78.
  • 10TEKINERDOGAN B. ASAAM:aspectual software architecture analysis method[A].Washington,DC:IEEE Computer Society,2004.5-14.

引证文献3

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部